<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:refworks="www.refworks.com/xml/">
<channel rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear">
<title><![CDATA[Current INHS Staff Publications]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[These are the latest additions to the INHS Staff Bibliography from the current year. The full bibliography is maintained by the Illinois Natural History Survey Library, and can be found at this URL: http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/INHS%20Staff%20Bibliography%201870%20to%20Present]]></description>
<refworks:publisher>RefWorks</refworks:publisher>
<link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear</link>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15973"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15972"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15971"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15964"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15963"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15949"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15948"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15947"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15946"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15945"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15944"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15943"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15942"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15940"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15925"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15923"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15922"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15921"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15920"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15918"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15916"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15915"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15911"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15910"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15909"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15907"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15904"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15903"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15900"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15897"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15896"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15894"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15893"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15892"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15891"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15889"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15890"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15888"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15887"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15886"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15885"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15884"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15883"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15882"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15881"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15859"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15858"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15857"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15855"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15854"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15973">
<title><![CDATA[Amplistroma gen. nov. and its relation to Wallrothiella, two genera with globose ascospores and acrodontium-like anamorphs]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Huhndorf,Sabine M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Miller,Andrew N*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Greif,Matthew]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Samuels,Gary J.]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[Amplistroma is described as a new genus for A. carolinianum, A. diminutisporum, A. guianense, A. hallingii, A. ravum, A. tartareum and A. xylarioides. Species of Amplistroma are distinguished by large stromata of textura intricata with polystichous ascomata and long necks that are either erumpent from the stromatal surface or form bumps Or protuberances. The type collection of Ceratostoma sphaerospermum was examined and found to be synonymous with Wallrothiella congregata. The distribution of W. congregata is expanded by collections from Costa Rica, the eastern United States and Puerto Rico. Wallrothiella congregata has ascomata that are long-necked and develop individually or are gregarious On the Substrate but do not form large stromata. Amplistroma and Wallrothiella are distinguished by small asci with eight, minute, globose ascospores. An acrodontium-like anamorph Occurs in both genera. Phylogenetic analyses of 28S large-subunit rDNA sequences group these taxa in a well supported clade distinct from known orders within the Sordariomycetidae but showing unsupported relationships with the Chaetosphaeriales and the Magnaporthaceae. Family Amplistromataceae is described for this clade and placed within the Sordariomycetidae incertae sedis.]]></description>
<dc:publisher><![CDATA[ALLEN PRESS INC]]></dc:publisher>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Mycologia]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[6]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[101]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[904]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[919]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[11/20/2009 8:43:57 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[11/20/2009 8:46:11 PM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15973</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[NOV-DEC]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Amplistromataceae]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Ascomycota]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ LSU rDNA]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ systematics]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ wood-inhabiting fungi]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ MICROSCOPY]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ TELEOMORPH]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Mycology]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:no><![CDATA[PT: J; NR: 26; TC: 0; J9: MYCOLOGIA; PG: 16; GA: 516QQ]]></refworks:no>
<refworks:pp><![CDATA[LAWRENCE; 810 E 10TH ST, LAWRENCE, KS 66044 USA]]></refworks:pp>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[0027-5514]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:ad><![CDATA[[Huhndorf, Sabine M.; Greif, Matthew] Field Museum Nat Hist, Dept Bot, Chicago, IL 60605 USA. [Miller, Andrew N.] Univ Illinois Urbana Champaign, Illinois Nat Hist Survey, Champaign, IL 61820 USA. [Samuels, Gary J.] USDA ARS, Systemat Mycol & Microbiol Lab, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA.; Huhndorf, SM, Field Museum Nat Hist, Dept Bot, Chicago, IL 60605 USA.; shuhndorf@fieldmuseum.org]]></refworks:ad>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:sf><![CDATA[Article]]></refworks:sf>
<refworks:do><![CDATA[10.3852/08-213]]></refworks:do>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Web of Science]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[11/20/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15973]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>
<refworks:an><![CDATA[000271557800017]]></refworks:an>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15972">
<title><![CDATA[Relative influence of landscape vs. local factors on plant community assembly in restored wetlands]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthews,Jeffrey W*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Peralta,Ariane L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Flanagan,Diana N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Baldwin,Patrick M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Soni,Arun]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Kent,Angela D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Endress,Anton G*]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[Ecological restoration often involves only the manipulation of abiotic  factors at the local scale. However, processes external to a  restoration site determine the range of local conditions within the  site, constraining the level of restoration progress that can be  achieved by on-site manipulations. We examined the relationship of  landscape and local explanatory variables to plant species composition  in 28 restored wetlands in Illinois, USA. Using constrained ordination  combined with variation partitioning, we determined the independent and  joint effects of three spatially hierarchical sets of variables: (1)  macroscale landscape features reflecting site setting within regional  landscapes, (2) mesoscale landscape features reflecting nearby  propagule sources and buffers from disturbances, and (3) local  environmental factors. Because the relative influence of landscape- vs.  local-scale factors on restoration success may depend on particular  restoration goals, we repeated the analyses using three multivariate  plant community responses that represented three frequently stated  goals: (1) replicating species composition, (2) restoring a particular  wetland community type, and (3) constructing sites with high value for  plant conservation. Explanatory variables at landscape and local scales  had independent and nearly equally strong relationships to plant  species composition. In contrast, when species were aggregated based on  plant traits, the independent contribution of local predictors was  greater than the independent contributions of macroscale or mesoscale  landscape predictors, reflecting convergence of plant trait composition  in sites with similar local conditions. Local predictors explained a  significant amount of variation in plant conservation value among  sites, but much of the variation could be explained by large-scale  landscape setting, indicating that landscape constraints on local  environmental conditions limited the level of floristic conservation  value achievable. The appropriate scale at which to focus restoration  efforts will vary depending upon restoration objectives. Restoration of  particular wetland community types might be successfully achieved  through manipulation of local abiotic factors. In contrast, restoration  of a particular species assemblage or reconstruction of wetlands with  high value for conservation requires consideration of landscape  processes and available species pools.]]></description>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Ecological Applications]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[8]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[19]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[2108]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[2123]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[11/18/2009 7:31:06 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[11/18/2009 7:36:15 PM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15972</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[12/01]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ constrained ordination]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ convergence]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ floodplain forest]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ floristic quality]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ land cover]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ marsh]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ plant species composition]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ restoration ecology]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ variation partitioning]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ wetland mitigation]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ wetland restoration]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:no><![CDATA[doi: 10.1890/08-1836.1]]></refworks:no>
<refworks:lk><![CDATA[http://www.esajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1890/08-1836.1]]></refworks:lk>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Author notification; Ecological Society of America]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[11/18/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15972]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15971">
<title><![CDATA[Trajectories of vegetation-based indicators used to assess wetland restoration progress]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthews,Jeffrey W*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Spyreas,Greg*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Endress,Anton G*]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[Temporal trends in attributes of restored ecosystems have been  described conceptually as restoration trajectories. Measures describing  the maturity or ecological integrity of a restoration site are often  assumed to follow monotonically increasing trajectories over time and  to eventually reach an asymptote representative of a reference  ecosystem. This assumption of simple, predictable restoration  trajectories underpins federal and state policies in the United States  that mandate wetland restoration as compensation for wetlands damaged  during development. We evaluated the validity of this assumption by  tracking changes in 11 indicators of floristic integrity, often used to  determine legal compliance, in 29 mitigation wetlands. Each indicator  was expressed as a percentile relative to the distribution of that  indicator among >100 naturally occurring reference wetlands.  Nonlinear regression was used to fit two alternative restoration  trajectories to data from each site: an asymptotic (negative  exponential) increase in the indicator over time and a peaked (double  exponential) relationship. Depending on the particular indicator,  between 48% and 76% of sites displayed trends that were at least  moderately well described (R2 > 0.5) by one of the  two models. Floristic indicators based on species richness, including  native richness, number of native genera, and the floristic quality  index, rapidly increased to asymptotes exceeding levels in a majority  of reference wetlands. In contrast, indicators based on species  composition, including mean coefficient of conservatism and relative  importance of perennial species, increased very slowly. Thus, some  indicators of restoration progress followed increasing trajectories and  achieved or surpassed levels equivalent to high-quality reference sites  within five years, whereas others appeared destined to either not reach  equivalency or to take much longer than mitigation wetlands are  typically monitored. Finally, some indicators of restoration progress,  such as relative importance of native species, often increased over the  first five to 10 years and then declined, which would result in a  misleading assessment of progress if based on typical time scales of  monitoring. Therefore, the assumption of simple, rapid, and predictable  restoration trajectories that underlies wetland mitigation policy is  unrealistic.]]></description>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Ecological Applications]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[8]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[19]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[2093]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[2107]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[11/18/2009 7:26:50 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[11/18/2009 7:30:10 PM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15971</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[12/01]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ bioindicators]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Carex]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ emergent wetland]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ floodplain forest]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ floristic quality]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ invasive species]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ reference sites]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ species richness]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ succession]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ wetland mitigation]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:no><![CDATA[doi: 10.1890/08-1371.1]]></refworks:no>
<refworks:lk><![CDATA[http://www.esajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1890/08-1371.1]]></refworks:lk>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Author notification; Ecological Society of America]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[11/18/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15971]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15964">
<title><![CDATA[The Biology of Small Mammals]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Merritt,Joseph F*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:publisher><![CDATA[Johns Hopkins University Press]]></dc:publisher>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Book, Whole]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[368]]></prism:startingPage>
<refworks:created><![CDATA[11/17/2009 3:08:33 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[11/17/2009 3:19:41 PM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15964</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[September 2009]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Mammals]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:no><![CDATA[Includes bibliographical references and index.;]]></refworks:no>
<refworks:pp><![CDATA[Baltimore]]></refworks:pp>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[9780801879500 (hardcover : alk. paper); 0801879507 (hardcover : alk. paper) LCCN: 2009-18389]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:lk><![CDATA[Description on publisher website: http://jhupbooks.press.jhu.edu/ecom/MasterServlet/GetItemDetailsHandler?iN=9780801879500&qty=1&source=2&viewMode=3&loggedIN=false&JavaScript=y]]></refworks:lk>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Author notification; WorldCat, publisher website]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15964]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15963">
<title><![CDATA[Epaulet color and sexual selection in the red-winged blackbird: a field experiment [Article in press]]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yasukawa,Ken]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Enstrom,David A*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Parker,Patricia G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Jones,Thomas C.]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[The epaulets of male Red-winged Blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus)  function in both intersexual and intrasexual contexts, but there is  little evidence that they covary with reproductive success in this well  studied species. We used path analysis of male/territory traits, mating  success, and reproductive success of unmanipulated males to estimate  current directional selection. Territory size had a positive effect on  number of within-pair mates. Number of extra-pair mates had a positive  effect on number of extra-pair fledglings, and number of within-pair  and extra-pair fledglings had positive effects on total number of  fledglings. We also reddened epaulets of free living territorial males  to determine whether manipulated and control males differ in  territorial behavior, mating success, or reproductive success. Compared  with control males, males with reddened epaulets incurred elevated  rates of trespassing and territorial challenges, lost their territories  more often, and were unable to produce extra pair offspring. Despite  these differences, however, the realized reproductive success of  experimental and control males did not differ significantly, perhaps  because males with reddened epaulets devoted more time to anti predator  vigilance and were more aggressive toward a simulated predator than  were control males. An apparent lack of current sexual selection on  epaulet color may be a form of counter-balancing sexual selection in  which male aggression against redder epaulets opposes female preference  for redder epaulets, or it might be the result of males compensating  for lost extra-pair fertilizations by increasing their parental care.]]></description>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[The Condor]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<refworks:created><![CDATA[11/9/2009 11:28:27 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[11/9/2009 11:35:05 PM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15963</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[Posted online on October 14, 2009.]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Agelaius phoeniceus]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Extra-pair paternity]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Intersexual selection]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Intrasexual selection]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Within-pair paternity]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[0010-5422]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:lk><![CDATA[http://caliber.ucpress.net/doi/abs/10.1525/cond.2009.090058]]></refworks:lk>
<refworks:do><![CDATA[10.1525/cond.2009.090058]]></refworks:do>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Author notification; downloaded from UC Press]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[11/9/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15963]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15949">
<title><![CDATA[Soil microbial communities alter allelopathic competition between Alliaria petiolata and a native species [Article in press]]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lankau,Richard A*]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[Allelopathy has been increasingly invoked as a mechanism facilitating exotic plant invasions. However, studies even on the same target species often yield varying results concerning the strength and importance of allelopathic inhibition, suggesting that the process may depend on the specific environmental context. Here I studied how the allelopathic inhibition of sycamore (Platanus occidentalis) seedlings by garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata) depended on the presence of a soil microbial community. Using three analytical approaches to quantifying allelopathy, I consistently found allelopathic inhibition only in sterilized soils, suggesting that certain microbial taxa inhibit the process, possibly by degrading the allelochemicals. Determining the environmental contexts that reduce or eliminate allelopathic inhibition could lead to a greater understanding of the spatial variation in invasion success and potentially lead to new avenues for management. © 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.]]></description>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Biological Invasions]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[1]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[10]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[11/4/2009 10:33:43 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[11/4/2009 10:35:42 PM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15949</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[Available online October 16, 2009]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Allelopathy]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Glucosinolates]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Platanus occidentalis]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Size asymmetry]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:no><![CDATA[Article in Press]]></refworks:no>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[13873547]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:ad><![CDATA[Affiliation: Illinois Natural History Survey, Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1816 S. Oak Street, Champaign, 61820, United States; Correspondence Address: Lankau, R.; Illinois Natural History Survey, Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1816 S. Oak Street, Champaign, 61820, IL, United States; email: ralankau@illinois.edu]]></refworks:ad>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:do><![CDATA[10.1007/s10530-009-9608-z]]></refworks:do>
<refworks:db><![CDATA[Scopus]]></refworks:db>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Scopus]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[11/4/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15949]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>
<refworks:ul><![CDATA[http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-70349892837&partnerID=40]]></refworks:ul>
<refworks:an><![CDATA[CODEN: BLINF]]></refworks:an>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15948">
<title><![CDATA[Vascular plant communities of the Green River lowlands, in northwestern Illinois]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ebinger,John E*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Phillippe,Loy R*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Handel,William C*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Cunningham,Connie J*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ McClain,William E*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Nyboer,Randy N*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Bitter,T.]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[A few high-quality prairies still exist in the sand deposits of the Green River Lowlands. The most extensive remnants are in the Green River State Wildlife Area, Lee County, Illinois. Three upland prairie communities were surveyed; a dry sand prairie dominated by Schizachyrium scoparium, Ambrosia psilostachya, and Amorpha canescens; a dry-mesic sand prairie dominated by Sorghastrum
nutans, Schizachyrium scoparium, Antennaria plantaginifolia, and Liatris aspera; and a mesic sand prairie where Sorghastrum nutans and Andropogon gerardii were the dominant grasses, and Parthenium integrifolium, Fragaria virginiana, Liatris pycnostachya, and Euthamia gymnospermoides the common forbs. The lowlands, which included approximately 325 ha, were dominated by the exotic Phalaris arundinacea, but high-quality wet sand prairie, sedge meadow, and marsh communities existed. The wet sand prairies were dominated by Spartina pectinata, Helianthus grosseserratus, and Solidago canadensis; the sedge meadows were dominated by Carex haydenii, Calamagrostis canadensis, and Persicaria coccinea; the marsh communities were divided into distinct vegetation zones. These vegetation zones were surveyed in 2002 and subjected to an extensive uncontrolled fire in 2005. Surveys completed in 2006 and 2007 were used to determine successional changes resulting from the fire. These studies suggested that most communities were returning to the species composition found before the 2005 fire.]]></description>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[2]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[39]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[1]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[40]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[11/4/2009 9:45:25 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[11/10/2009 2:21:55 PM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15948</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[October 2009]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Sand prairies]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Lee County, IL]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Wet sand prairies]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Sedge meadows]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Marshes]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Vegetation zones]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Ecological succession]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Fire]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Green River State Wildlife Area]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[0073-4918]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:sf><![CDATA[Article]]></refworks:sf>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Hand entered from source]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15948]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15947">
<title><![CDATA[Nesting biology of mallards in west-central Illinois]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yetter,Aaron P*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Stafford,Joshua D*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Hine,Christopher S*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Bowyer,Matthew W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Havera,Stephen P*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Horath,Michelle M*]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[The number of Mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) breeding in Illinois and eastern North America has increased in recent decades; however, few studies have investigated the nesting biology of Mallards outside primary production areas. Therefore, we radiomarked resident female Mallards (n = 148) in west-central Illinois during 1998–2003 to assess nesting parameters and evaluate recruitment. Mean initiation date for first nests ranged from 22 April to 6 May, and the majority (75%) of nests were initiated by 20 May. Therefore, the majority of nests were predicted to hatch by 24 June. The nesting season averaged 88 days (range: 77–103 days). The proportion of unsuccessful females that renested ranged from 50.0–85.7%, and adults were more likely to renest (75.0%) than yearlings (48.0%). Nest success ranged from 9.8–33.3% and was 19.6% overall; hen success was 28.3%.  Initial brood size was 8.2 ± 0.3 ducklings, but brood size declined to 3.0 ± 0.6 ducklings by 17 days posthatch. Brood survival to 20 days was 0.759 ± 0.081, and 20-day duckling survival was 0.413 ± 0.035. Female survival during spring-summer ranged from 0.546–1.00 and averaged 0.710 ± 0.096. Likewise, estimated Mallard recruitment varied annually (range: 0.302–0.672 female ducklings/female). Assuming constant female and duckling survival, we estimated that a recruitment rate of 0.613 female ducklings/adult female was necessary to maintain a stable Mallard breeding population in west-central Illinois. Estimated Mallard reproduction and recruitment was similar to that observed in other areas of North America. Nest success and hen success approached or exceeded estimated thresholds for population stability in most years; however, hen success averaged over the study period was insufficient for local population maintenance and growth. Female survival was comparable to that observed in other studies but may have limited population growth in some years. Duckling survival was sufficient for population maintenance. Management designed to enhance hen success and brood habitat may augment Mallard recruitment in west-central Illinois.]]></description>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[1]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[39]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[1]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[38]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[11/4/2009 9:37:56 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[11/4/2009 9:48:24 PM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15947</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[August 2009]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ waterfowl]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Anas platyrhynchos]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ brood size]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ recruitment]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ mallard ducks]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[0073-4918]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:sf><![CDATA[Article]]></refworks:sf>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[hand entry from source]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15947]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15946">
<title><![CDATA[Signatures of high-altitude adaptation in the major hemoglobin of five species of Andean dabbling ducks]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McCracken,Kevin G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Barger,Christopher P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Bulgarella,Mariana]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Johnson,Kevin P*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Kuhner,Mary K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Moore,Andrew V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Peters,Jeffrey L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Trucco,Jorge]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Valqui,Thomas H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Winker,Kevin]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Wilson,Robert E.]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[Hypoxia is one of the most important factors affecting survival at high altitude, and the major hemoglobin protein is a likely target of selection. We compared population genetic structure in the alpha A and beta A hemoglobin subunits (HBA2 and HBB) of five paired lowland and highland populations of Andean dabbling ducks to unlinked reference loci. In the hemoglobin genes, parallel amino acid replacements were overrepresented in highland lineages, and one to five derived substitutions occurred at external solvent-accessible positions on the alpha and beta subunits, at alpha(1)beta(1) intersubunit contacts, or in close proximity to inositolpentaphosphate (IPP) binding sites. Coalescent analyses incorporating the stochasticity of drift and mutation indicated that hemoglobin alleles were less likely to be transferred between highland and lowland populations than unlinked alleles at five other loci. Amino acid replacements that were overrepresented in the highlands were rarely found within lowland populations, suggesting that alleles segregating at high frequency in the highlands may be maladaptive in the lowlands and vice versa. Most highland populations are probably nonmigratory and locally adapted to the Altiplano, but gene flow for several species may be sufficiently high to retard divergence at unlinked loci. Heterozygosity was elevated in the alpha A or beta A subunits of highland populations exhibiting high gene flow between the southern lowlands and the highlands and in highland species that disperse seasonally downslope to midelevation environments from the central Andean plateau. However, elevated heterozygosity occurred more frequently in the alpha A subunit but not simultaneously in both subunits, suggesting that selection may be more constrained by epistasis in the beta A subunit. Concordant patterns among multiple species with different evolutionary histories and depths of historical divergence and gene flow suggest that the major hemoglobin genes of these five dabbling duck species have evolved adaptively in response to high-altitude hypoxia in the Andes.]]></description>
<dc:publisher><![CDATA[UNIV CHICAGO PRESS]]></dc:publisher>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[American Naturalist]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[5]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[174]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[631]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[650]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/30/2009 10:12:14 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/30/2009 10:15:06 PM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15946</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[NOV]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Anas]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Balancing selection]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Hypoxia]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Lophonetta]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Migration]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Waterfowl]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ DNA Polymorphism]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:pp><![CDATA[CHICAGO; 1427 E 60TH ST, CHICAGO, IL 60637-2954 USA]]></refworks:pp>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[0003-0147]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:ad><![CDATA[[McCracken, Kevin G.; Barger, Christopher P.; Bulgarella, Mariana; Moore, Andrew V.; Peters, Jeffrey L.; Winker, Kevin; Wilson, Robert E.] Univ Alaska, Inst Arctic Biol, Dept Biol & Wildlife, Fairbanks, AK 99775 USA. [McCracken, Kevin G.; Barger, Christopher P.; Bulgarella, Mariana; Moore, Andrew V.; Peters, Jeffrey L.; Winker, Kevin; Wilson, Robert E.] Univ Alaska, Univ Alaska Museum, Fairbanks, AK 99775 USA. [Johnson, Kevin P.] Illinois Nat Hist Survey, Champaign, IL 61820 USA. [Kuhner, Mary K.] Univ Washington, Dept Genome Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA. [Trucco, Jorge] Patagonia Outfitters, RA-8370 San Martin, Neuquen, Argentina. [Valqui, Thomas H.] CORBIDI, Lima 33, Peru. [Valqui, Thomas H.] Louisiana State Univ, Museum Nat Sci, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA.; McCracken, KG, Univ Alaska, Inst Arctic Biol, Dept Biol & Wildlife, Fairbanks, AK 99775 USA.; fnkgm@uaf.edu]]></refworks:ad>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:sf><![CDATA[Article]]></refworks:sf>
<refworks:do><![CDATA[10.1086/606020]]></refworks:do>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Web of Science]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[10/30/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15946]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>
<refworks:an><![CDATA[000271021900006]]></refworks:an>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15945">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of common carp on reproduction, growth, and survival of largemouth bass and bluegills]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolfe,Matthew D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Santucci,Victor J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Einfalt,Lisa M*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Wahl,David H*]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[The common carp Cyprinus carpio was introduced to North America  more than a century ago, but little research has focused on  interactions between this invasive species and native fishes. We used  large mesocosms (600 m2) within drainable 0.4-ha ponds to examine the effects of adult common carp on (1) reproduction of largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides and bluegills Lepomis macrochirus  and (2) growth and survival of the larvae and juveniles of these  centrarchid species. In separate enclosures, adult bluegills or  largemouth bass were stocked with or without common carp. In enclosures  with common carp, turbidity was substantially higher, but both  centrarchid species spawned and the densities and sizes of larval  largemouth bass and bluegills were similar to those of larvae in  enclosures without common carp. As juveniles grew, largemouth bass  survived at a higher rate but were smaller in enclosures containing  common carp compared with largemouth bass in enclosures without common  carp. In a second experiment, we stocked known numbers of older  juvenile centrarchids into enclosures and found decreased growth for  both largemouth bass and bluegills. However, survival of largemouth  bass was again higher in enclosures with common carp. Although  centrarchid spawning was successful and larval growth and survival did  not decrease in the presence of common carp, centrarchid growth slowed  at the juvenile stage, probably due to food resource limitation  resulting from direct competition with common carp for invertebrate  forage, high turbidity caused by common carp, or both of these factors.]]></description>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Transactions of the American Fisheries Society]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[5]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[138]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[975]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[983]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/30/2009 8:44:31 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/30/2009 8:49:01 PM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15945</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[September 2009; Published Online: July 9, 2009]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Cyprinus]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Fisheries]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Invasive fish]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:no><![CDATA[doi: 10.1577/T08-115.1]]></refworks:no>
<refworks:lk><![CDATA[http://dx.doi.org/10.1577/T08-115.1]]></refworks:lk>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Author notification; American Fisheries Society]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15945]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15944">
<title><![CDATA[Growth and Survival of Four Sizes of Stocked Largemouth Bass]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diana,Matt J*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Wahl,David H*]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[We compared growth and survival (including losses to stocking stress and predation) of four sizes of largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides  in four Illinois reservoirs. Fish were stocked as small fingerlings (55  mm total length) in July, medium fingerlings (100 mm) in August, large  fingerlings (150 mm) in September, and advanced fingerlings (200 mm)  the subsequent spring. Survival of small fingerlings was very low  (catch per unit effort < 1 fish/h of electrofishing in the fall  after stocking), and fish stocked as small fingerlings were not  observed in electrofishing samples after the spring following stocking.  In samples collected soon after stocking, large and advanced  fingerlings were larger and more abundant than other sizes. However, in  subsequent sampling, there were no differences in size or survival  among fish stocked as medium, large, and advanced fingerlings.  Long-term growth of stocked fish was similar to that of wild fish, but  survival of stocked fish was low for all sizes. Mean initial stocking  mortality for fish held in cages was variable but generally low  (0.0–5.6%) and was related to lake temperature at stocking. The diets  of predators (primarily adult largemouth bass) contained high numbers  of small-, medium-, and large-sized fingerlings after stocking, but no  predation was observed on advanced fingerlings. Cost of producing fish  increased with size, and cost–benefit analysis determined that medium  (100-mm) fish had the greatest return per cost. We recommend stocking  medium fingerlings because the stocking of larger fingerlings did not  produce a significant increase in survival.]]></description>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[North American Journal of Fisheries Management]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[6]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[29]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[1653]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[1663]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/30/2009 8:22:13 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/30/2009 8:51:08 PM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15944</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[December 2009; Published Online: October 15, 2009]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:no><![CDATA[doi: 10.1577/M09-001.1]]></refworks:no>
<refworks:lk><![CDATA[http://afsjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1577/M09-001.1]]></refworks:lk>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Author notification; American Fisheries Society]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[10/30/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15944]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15943">
<title><![CDATA[Population and community ecology of Centrarchidae]]></title>
<refworks:t2><![CDATA[Centrarchid Fishes: Diversity, Biology and Conservation]]></refworks:t2>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aday,D. Derek*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Parkos,J. J.,III]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Wahl,David H*]]></dc:creator>
<refworks:a2><![CDATA[Cooke,Steven J*]]></refworks:a2>
<refworks:a2><![CDATA[ Philipp,David P*]]></refworks:a2>
<dc:publisher><![CDATA[Wiley-Blackwell]]></dc:publisher>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Book, Section]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[134]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[164]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/30/2009 8:12:57 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[11/6/2009 3:30:12 PM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15943</link>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Centrarchidae]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Population & community ecology]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Fish]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:pp><![CDATA[Chichester]]></refworks:pp>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[978-1-4051-3342-5]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:ad><![CDATA[Aday, D.D.; Department of Zoology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA]]></refworks:ad>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:sf><![CDATA[Book chapter]]></refworks:sf>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Author notification; Zoological record]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[10/30/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15943]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY09]]></refworks:u1>
<refworks:an><![CDATA[ZOOR14510066386; ZOOREC:ZOOR14510066386 ER]]></refworks:an>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15942">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of fin-clipping on the foraging behavior and growth of age-0 muskellunge]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wagner,Curtis P*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Einfalt,Lisa M*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Scimone,Adam B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Wahl,David H*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[North American Journal of Fisheries Management]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[6]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[29]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[1644]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[1652]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/30/2009 6:31:05 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/30/2009 6:34:59 PM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15942</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[December 2009; Published Online: October 15, 2009; 12/01]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:no><![CDATA[doi: 10.1577/M08-214.1]]></refworks:no>
<refworks:lk><![CDATA[http://afsjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1577/M08-214.1]]></refworks:lk>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Author notification; American Fisheries Society]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[10/30/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15942]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15940">
<title><![CDATA[Notes on California Malvaceae including nomenclatural changes and additions to the flora]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hill,Steven R*]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[The writing of revised treatments for selected California Malvaceae for the upcoming second edition of the Jepson Manual and the Flora of North America  series (volume 6) has made several nomenclatural changes and  explanations necessary. New combinations are made here for taxa in Sidalcea, including Sidalcea asprella subsp. nana, Sidalcea calycosa subsp. rhizomata, Sidalcea celata, and Sidalcea sparsifolia. Several taxa previously included within Sidalcea malviflora have been removed from that species and re-interpreted, resulting in the resurrection and acceptance of the names Sidalcea asprella Greene and Sidalcea elegans Greene. Comments are presented here on the status of Hibiscus lasiocarpos and Lavatera vs. Malva in the California flora. At least one native species has been added to the flora, namely, Iliamna rivularis,  though it may no longer occur in the state. Four species of Malvaceae  have become naturalized or have been found as waifs in recent years and  are added to the flora, namely, Anoda pentaschista, Lagunaria patersonia, Lavatera olbia, and Lavatera trimestris.]]></description>
<dc:publisher><![CDATA[California Botanical Society]]></dc:publisher>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Madroño]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[2]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[56]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[104]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[111]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/30/2009 2:26:27 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/30/2009 2:36:46 PM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15940</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[04/14]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ California]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Hibiscus]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Lagunaria]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Lavatera]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Malva]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Malvaceae]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Sidalcea]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[0024-9637]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:lk><![CDATA[http://dx.doi.org/10.3120/0024-9637-56.2.104]]></refworks:lk>
<refworks:do><![CDATA[10.3120/0024-9637-56.2.104]]></refworks:do>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Author notification; BioOne]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[10/30/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15940]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY09]]></refworks:u1>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15925">
<title><![CDATA[Distributional note: Graptemys geographica (northern map turtle).]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lamer,James T*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Jenkins,Sean E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Jenkins,Brian P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Jenkins,Samuel W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Dolan,Chad R*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Tucker,John K*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2008]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Herpetological Review]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[2]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[39]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[236]]></prism:startingPage>
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/26/2009 4:03:32 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/26/2009 4:21:02 PM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15925</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[June]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Graptemys geographica [Illinois / Hancock County / New record].]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Chordates]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Reptiles]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Vertebrates]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Graptemys geographica (Testudinidae): [New record].]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:no><![CDATA[PT: J
ME: Print
BD: Land zones; Nearctic region; North America; USA
ST: Reptilia, Anapsida, Testudines, Cryptodira, Testudinidae]]></refworks:no>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[0018-084X]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:ad><![CDATA[Lamer, James T.; Western Illinois University, 1 University Circle, Macomb, Illinois 61455, USA]]></refworks:ad>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:sf><![CDATA[Article]]></refworks:sf>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Author notification; Zoological Record]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[10/26/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15925]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY08]]></refworks:u1>
<refworks:an><![CDATA[ZOOR14411068622; ZOOREC:ZOOR14411068622]]></refworks:an>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15923">
<title><![CDATA[Proposed conservation of the name Gastrimargus Saussure, 1884 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Oedipodinae) threatened by an unused senior homonym]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heads,Sam W*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Maehr,Michael D*]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[Gastrimargus Saussure, 1884 includes 23 species of economically important locustine grasshoppers (Acrididae: Oedipodinae: Locustini) distributed throughout Africa, Australia and Southeast Asia (Ritchie, 1982). Whilst reviewing oedipodine genus-group names in the Orthoptera Species File Online (Eades & Otte, 2009) we encountered an unused senior homonym—Gastrimargus Spix, 1823 used for a genus of Neotropical primates —which has seniority over Gastrimargus Saussure, 1884 according to the Principle of Priority (ICZN, 1999: Article 23.1). However, the senior homonym is universally considered as a junior synonym of another genus and has not been used as valid since 1899, thereby qualifying as a nomen oblitum. Here we present a case for the ‘automatic’ conservation of Gastrimargus Saussure, 1884 following the requirements of Article 23.9.2 of the Code.]]></description>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Zootaxa]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[2268]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[65]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[68]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/25/2009 5:36:10 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[11/17/2009 3:30:55 PM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15923</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[20 October 2009]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Gastrimargus]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Homonym]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Taxonomy]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Orthoptera]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Author notification; hand entered.]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15923]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15922">
<title><![CDATA[The effects of turbidity on prey selection by piscivorous largemouth bass]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shoup,Daniel E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Wahl,David H*]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[Turbidity in aquatic systems can change rapidly, affecting the visual ability of predators. Increased turbidity is known to reduce the reactive distance and foraging success of some planktivores and insectivores, leading to decreased growth rates. However, little is known about the effects of turbidity on prey selection by piscivores. We examined the interactions between largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides and their prey in 1.8-m-diameter tanks (58 cm deep) at four turbidity levels (0, 5, 10, and 40 nephelometric turbidity units [NTU]). Prey selectivity was significantly affected by turbidity. At lower turbidity levels (0 and 5 NTU), largemouth bass consumed mostly gizzard shad Dorosoma cepedianum and bluegills Lepomis macrochirus and had negative selectivity for northern crayfish Orconectes virilis. At 10 NTU, all three prey types had similar selectivity, presumably because the largemouth bass had more difficulty in capturing rapidly moving fish prey as their reactive distances decreased. At 40 NTU, the overall foraging rate was much lower and bluegills were selected significantly more often than the other prey types. Low light levels at the bottom of the tanks combined with reductions in visual clarity from clay sediments probably made it difficult for largemouth bass to feed effectively on virile crayfish at higher turbidities. Our results suggest that trophic interactions may be altered as turbidity levels change.]]></description>
<dc:publisher><![CDATA[American Fisheries Society]]></dc:publisher>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Transactions of the American Fisheries Society]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[5]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[138]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[1018]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[1027]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/25/2009 5:05:10 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:18:21 AM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15922</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[Sep]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Clays]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Growth rate]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Insectivores]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Light effects]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Predators]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Prey]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Sediments]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Turbidity]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Cambaridae]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Dorosoma cepedianum]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Lepomis macrochirus]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Micropterus salmoides]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Orconectes virilis]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:pp><![CDATA[5410 Grosvenor Ln. Bethesda MD 20814-2199 USA]]></refworks:pp>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[1548-8659]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:ad><![CDATA[Kaskaskia Biological Station, Illinois Natural History Survey, Rural Route 1, Box 157, Sullivan, Illinois 61951, USA, [mailto:dshoup@okstate.edu]]]></refworks:ad>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English; English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:cl><![CDATA[D 04040 Ecosystem and Ecology Studies; Y 25040 Behavioral Ecology]]></refworks:cl>
<refworks:sf><![CDATA[Journal Article; Animal Behavior Abstracts; Sustainability Science Abstracts; ASFA 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources; Ecology Abstracts]]></refworks:sf>
<refworks:do><![CDATA[10.1577/T09-015.1]]></refworks:do>
<refworks:db><![CDATA[ASFA 1: Biological Sciences and Living Resources]]></refworks:db>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[ASFA1]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[10/25/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15922]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>
<refworks:an><![CDATA[11010766]]></refworks:an>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15921">
<title><![CDATA[Fish diversity and abundance in relation to interannual and lake-specific variation in abiotic characteristics of floodplain lakes of the lower Kaskaskia River, Illinois]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shoup,Daniel E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Wahl,David H*]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[The importance of floodplain lakes to tropical river systems is well established, but little is known about the function of these habitats in temperate river systems. We examined fish diversity, abundance, and reproduction within six oxbow lakes of the Kaskaskia River, Illinois, over 5 years and their relationship to 11 abiotic environmental variables. The lakes were hydrologically dynamic within and among years, varying in the time connected with the main stem (0-22 weeks/year) and the frequency of low (<0.3-m) water (0-23 weeks/year). Differences were found both among years and lakes. All measured limnological variables (dissolved oxygen, Secchi disk depth, conductivity, and temperature) varied temporally, but only conductivity and Secchi disk depth varied among lakes. Fish species differed among lakes and between adjacent lotic habitats, and species-specific abundance varied among years, seasons, and lakes. This variation was related to several environmental variables. Diversity was positively related to the distance between the oxbow lake and the river but not to any variables that had interannual variation. Seine catch per unit effort (CPUE) was negatively related to mean water level and Secchi disk depth. Total electrofishing CPUE was not related to any variables; however, that of bluegills Lepomis macrochirus was positively related to maximum depth and that of warmouths L. gulosus was positively related to vegetated area. Across all lakes, evidence of reproduction was found for five species and was negatively related to the mean water level and frequency of low water and positively related to flood periodicity. The oxbow lakes have the potential to contribute to the fish community of the main river by providing spawning and nursery habitat for several fish species as well as helping maintain several less abundant main-stem species. However, when considering management options to maintain or restore these ecosystem functions, interannual variation in environmental variables, particularly those related to flood periodicity, should be considered.]]></description>
<dc:publisher><![CDATA[American Fisheries Society]]></dc:publisher>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Transactions of the American Fisheries Society]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[5]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[138]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[1076]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[1092]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/25/2009 5:00:52 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/30/2009 9:28:39 PM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15921</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[Sep]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Abundance]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Floods]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Habitat]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Lakes]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Periodicity]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Reproduction]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Rivers]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Water levels]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Lepomis macrochirus]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:pp><![CDATA[5410 Grosvenor Ln. Bethesda MD 20814-2199 USA]]></refworks:pp>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[1548-8659]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:ad><![CDATA[Kaskaskia Biological Station, Illinois Natural History Survey, Rural Route 1, Box 157, Sullivan, Illinois 61951, USA, [mailto:dshoup@okstate.edu]]]></refworks:ad>
<refworks:cl><![CDATA[D 04040 Ecosystem and Ecology Studies]]></refworks:cl>
<refworks:sf><![CDATA[Journal Article; Sustainability Science Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts; Aqualine Abstracts; ASFA 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources; Ecology Abstracts]]></refworks:sf>
<refworks:do><![CDATA[10.1577/T07-272.1]]></refworks:do>
<refworks:db><![CDATA[ASFA 1: Biological Sciences and Living Resources]]></refworks:db>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[ASFA1]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[10/25/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15921]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>
<refworks:an><![CDATA[11010747]]></refworks:an>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15920">
<title><![CDATA[Interactions of multiple predators with different foraging modes in an aquatic food web [Article in Press]]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carey,Michael P*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Wahl,David H*]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[Top predators can have different foraging modes that may alter their interactions and effects on food webs. Interactions between predators may be non-additive resulting from facilitation or interference, whereas their combined effects on a shared prey may result in emergent effects that are risk enhanced or risk reduced. To test the importance of multiple predators with different foraging modes, we examined the interaction between a cruising predator (largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides) and an ambush predator (muskellunge, Esox masquinongy) foraging on a shared prey (bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus) with strong anti-predator defense behaviors. Additive and substitution designs were used to compare individual to combined predator treatments in experimental ponds. The multiple predator interaction facilitated growth of the cruising predator in the combined predator treatments, whereas predator species had substitutable effects on the growth of the ambush predator. The combined predator treatments created an emergent effect on the prey; however, the direction was dependent on the experimental design. The additive design found a risk-reducing effect, whereas the substitution design found a risk-enhancing effect for prey fish. Indirect effects from the predators weakly extended to lower trophic levels (i.e., zooplankton community). Our results highlight the need to consider differences in foraging mode of top predators, interactions between predators, and emergent effects on prey to understand food webs. © 2009 Springer-Verlag.]]></description>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Oecologia]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[1]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[10]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/24/2009 8:03:52 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:15:45 AM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15920</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[Published online September 24, 2009]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Additive design]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Multiple predators]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Risk-enhanced effect]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Substitution design]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:no><![CDATA[Article in Press]]></refworks:no>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[00298549]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:ad><![CDATA[Affiliation: Sam Parr Biological Station, Illinois Natural History Survey, 6401 Meacham Road, Kinmundy, 62854, United States; Affiliation: Program in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, 61801, United States; Affiliation: NOAA Fisheries, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, 2725 Montlake Boulevard East, Seattle, 98112, United States; Correspondence Address: Carey, M.P.; NOAA Fisheries, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, 2725 Montlake Boulevard East, Seattle, 98112, WA, United States; email: Michael.P.Carey@noaa.gov]]></refworks:ad>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:do><![CDATA[10.1007/s00442-009-1461-3]]></refworks:do>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[SCOPUS]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[24 October 2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15920]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>
<refworks:ul><![CDATA[http://www.scopus.com.proxy2.library.uiuc.edu/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-70349260922&partnerID=40]]></refworks:ul>
<refworks:an><![CDATA[CODEN: OECOB]]></refworks:an>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15918">
<title><![CDATA[Treatment of Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera, Lymantriidae) host larvae with polydnavirus/venom of a braconid parasitoid increases spore production of entomopathogenic microsporidia]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hoch,Gernot]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Solter,Leellen F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Schopf,Axel]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[Female Glyptapanteles liparidis (Hym., Braconidae) were irradiated in a caesium-137 irradiator; these wasps oviposit nonviable eggs along with polydnavirus and venom into the host (=pseudoparasitization). When Lymantria dispar larvae were infected with microsporidian species for which they are permissive or semi-permissive hosts, spore production was higher in pseudoparasitized than in unparasitized larvae.]]></description>
<dc:publisher><![CDATA[Taylor & Francis]]></dc:publisher>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Biocontrol Science and Technology]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[1 supp 1]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[19]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[35]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[42]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/23/2009 10:06:43 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:16:10 AM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15918</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[First Published on: 10 October 2008]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ microsporidia]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Nosema portugal]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Vairimorpha necatrix]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ host suitability]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ polydnavirus]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ immune suppression]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[0958-3157]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:lk><![CDATA[http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/09583150802364868]]></refworks:lk>
<refworks:do><![CDATA[10.1080/09583150802364868]]></refworks:do>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Author notification; publisher website]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15918]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY09]]></refworks:u1>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15916">
<title><![CDATA[Biological consequences of invasion by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea)[Article in press]]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spyreas,Greg*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Wilm,Brian*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Plocher,Allen*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Ketzner,David]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Matthews,Jeffrey]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Ellis,James L*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Heske,Edward J*]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[Abstract  Although they are typically assumed to be negative, the consequences of plant invasions for native diversity or biological integrity are seldom broadly quantified (i.e., for multiple taxa or across large regions). We investigated the impacts associated with invasion of wetlands by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.; RCG) on plants and several animal groups. In a local study, we compared plants, arthropods, and small mammals on treatment plots with reduced RCG dominance to those on highly invaded plots. We also conducted a companion study, where we measured RCG dominance and plants, arthropods, and birds in 82 randomly selected wetlands across Illinois (USA) to determine if our experimental results were consistent in communities across the region. Plant diversity, floristic quality, and diversity and abundance of Homopteran insects decreased with RCG dominance in all instances. Richness and abundance of all other arthropods decreased with increasing RCG in the local study, but no trend was detected in communities statewide. No relationship between total abundance or richness of small mammals (local) or birds (statewide) with RCG was detected. However, voles and shrews were more abundant, and mice less abundant, in RCG-dominated plots. These results support the hypothesis that there are negative effects for multiple taxa from RCG invasion. Because negative effects observed in the local study either corroborated, or were neutral with respect to results from statewide surveys, they suggest that native biodiversity and biological integrity are being dampened across wide areas of this invader’s range.]]></description>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Biological Invasions]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/23/2009 9:40:12 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:18:21 AM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15916</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[Published online: 2 August 2009]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:no><![CDATA[M3: 10.1007/s10530-009-9544-y]]></refworks:no>
<refworks:lk><![CDATA[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9544-y]]></refworks:lk>
<refworks:do><![CDATA[10.1007/s10530-009-9544-y]]></refworks:do>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Author notification; Springerlink]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[10/23/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15916]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10?]]></refworks:u1>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15915">
<title><![CDATA[Vegetation survey of Tomlin Timber Nature Preserve, Mason County, Illinois.]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phillippe,Loy Richard*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Ellis,James L*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Busemeyer,D. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ McClain,W. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Ebinger,John E*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Erigenia]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[22]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[36]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[44]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/23/2009 9:34:08 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:18:00 AM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15915</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[Winter 2009]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Author notification; hand entered]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15915]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY09]]></refworks:u1>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15911">
<title><![CDATA[Estimating bobcat population sizes and densities in a fragmented urban landscape using noninvasive capture-recapture sampling]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruell,Emily W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Riley,Seth P. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Douglas,Marlis R*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Pollinger,John P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Crooks,Kevin R.]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[Bobcats (Lynx rufus) are valuable indicators of connectivity in the highly fragmented landscape of coastal Southern California, yet their population sizes and densities are largely unknown. Using noninvasive scat sampling in It capture-recapture framework, we estimated population sizes for 2 similar areas of natural habitat with differing levels of isolation by human development in Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area, California. We used scat transects with geographic information system land-use layers and home-range sizes of bobcats to estimate effective sampling area and Population densities. Estimates of population size in the study area connected to I much larger habitat area (26-31 individuals) were similar to estimates for the area that was completely surrounded by development (25-28 individuals). Bobcat densities for the 2 Study areas also were similar (ranging from 0.25 to 0.42 bobcat/km(2)) and likely represent recent population declines because of notoedric mange likely interacting with toxicants. These methods proved effective despite particularly low densities of bobcats and may be especially useful when Study areas are geographically isolated, reducing the uncertainty in size of the sampling area.]]></description>
<dc:publisher><![CDATA[ALLIANCE COMMUNICATIONS GROUP DIVISION ALLEN PRESS]]></dc:publisher>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Journal of Mammalogy]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[1]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[90]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[129]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[135]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/23/2009 8:49:32 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:18:20 AM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15911</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[FEB 18]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ bobcat]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ capture-recapture]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ effective sampling area]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Lynx rufus]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ population density]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ population size]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ scat]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ abundance estimation]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ habitat fragmentation]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ genotyping feces]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ brown bears]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ fecal dna]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ microsatellite]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ radiotelemetry]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:no><![CDATA[PT: J; NR: 40; TC: 0; J9: J MAMMAL; PG: 7; GA: 413QF]]></refworks:no>
<refworks:pp><![CDATA[LAWRENCE; 810 EAST 10TH STREET, LAWRENCE, KS 66044 USA]]></refworks:pp>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[0022-2372]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:ad><![CDATA[[Ruell, Emily W.; Douglas, Marlis R.; Crooks, Kevin R.] Colorado State Univ, Grad Degree Program Ecol, Dept Fish Wildlife & Conservat Biol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA. [Riley, Seth P. D.] Natl Pk Serv, Santa Monica Mt Natl Recreat Area, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 USA. [Pollinger, John P.] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA.; Ruell, EW, Colorado State Univ, Grad Degree Program Ecol, Dept Fish Wildlife & Conservat Biol, 1474 Campus Delivery, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA.; eruell@lamar.colostate.edu]]></refworks:ad>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:sf><![CDATA[Article]]></refworks:sf>
<refworks:db><![CDATA[Web of Knowledge]]></refworks:db>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Author notification; Web of Knowledge]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[10/23/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15911]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY09]]></refworks:u1>
<refworks:an><![CDATA[000263806900014]]></refworks:an>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15910">
<title><![CDATA[Further  ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from caves of Texas]]></title>
<refworks:t2><![CDATA[Studies  on the Cave and Endogean Fauna of North America]]></refworks:t2>
<refworks:t3><![CDATA[Texas Memorial Museum Speleological  Monographs]]></refworks:t3>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cokendolpher,J. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Reddell,J. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Taylor,Steven J*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Krejca,Jean K*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Suarez,A. V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Pekins,C. E.]]></dc:creator>
<refworks:a2><![CDATA[Cokendolpher,J. C.]]></refworks:a2>
<refworks:a2><![CDATA[ Reddell,J. R.]]></refworks:a2>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Book, Section]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[7]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[151]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[168]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/23/2009 8:15:56 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:15:45 AM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15910</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[10 March 2009]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15910]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY09]]></refworks:u1>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15909">
<title><![CDATA[Important bird records from two expeditions to the Upper Guinea Forest of Ghana]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weckstein,J. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Marks,B. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Moyle,R. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Johnson,Kevin P*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Meyer,Mathys J*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Braimah,J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Oppong,J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Amponsah,J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Malimbus]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[31]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[28]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[46]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/23/2009 7:38:31 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:19:24 AM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15909</link>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Author notification; hand entered.]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15909]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY09]]></refworks:u1>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15907">
<title><![CDATA[Comparative phylogenetic histories of two louse genera found on Catharus thrushes and other birds]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bueter,C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Weckstein,Jason]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Johnson,Kevin P*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Bates,John M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Gordon,Caleb E.]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[The louse genera Brueelia (Ischnocera) and Myrsidea (Amblycera) are broadly codistributed on songbirds (Passeriformes), but differ in a variety of life history characteristics. We used mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences to assess levels of genetic divergence and reconstruct phylogenies of these 2 genera, focusing especially on Catharus thrushes in North America. We then qualitatively compared the phylogenies and levels of divergence within these 2 genera of codistributed parasites. Neither Brueelia nor Myrsidea appears to cospeciate with Catharus thrushes or passerine birds in general. The Myrsidea phylogeny exhibits significant levels of biogeographic structure, whereas the Brueelia phylogeny does not. Myrsidea and Brueelia also differ in their levels of intra-generic genetic divergence, with Myrsidea showing higher levels of genetic divergence and host specificity than Brueelia. Our genetic data support traditional morphology-based taxonomy in several instances in which the same species of Brueelia has been reported on multiple host taxa, e.g., all migrant Catharus spp. carry B. antiqua, with little haplotype divergence. Myrsidea found on each Catharus sp. are in general genetically distinct, except for M. incerta, which parasitizes both Catharus ustulatus and Catharus minimus. The strong biogeographic signal in the Myrsidea phylogeny and higher relative levels of host specificity of Myrsidea spp. suggest that infrequent host-switching, followed by speciation, is shaping the evolutionary history of this group. In contrast, the relatively lower host specificity of Brueelia spp. suggests that host-switching, combined with more frequent ongoing dispersal, has been more important in the evolutionary history of Brueelia.]]></description>
<dc:publisher><![CDATA[American Society of Parasitologists]]></dc:publisher>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Journal of Parasitology]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[2]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[95]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[295]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[307]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/23/2009 7:27:54 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:15:44 AM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15907</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[April 2009]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ coevolution]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ lice]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ host-parasite relationships]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[0022-3395]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:lk><![CDATA[http://dx.doi.org/10.1645%2FGE-1642.1]]></refworks:lk>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Author notification; Download from source publication]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[10/23/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15907]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY09]]></refworks:u1>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15904">
<title><![CDATA[Life-history traits and energetic status in relation to vulnerability to angling in an experimentally selected teleost fish]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redpath,T. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Cooke,Steven J*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Arlinghaus,R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Wahl,David H*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Philipp,David P*]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[In recreational fisheries, a correlation has been established between fishing-induced selection pressures and the metabolic traits of individual fish. This study used a population of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) with lines of low vulnerability fish (LVF) and high vulnerability fish (HVF) that were previously established through artificial truncation selection experiments. The main objective was to evaluate if differential vulnerability to angling was correlated with growth, energetics and nutritional condition during the sub-adult stage. Absolute growth rate was found to be between 9% and 17% higher for LVF compared with HVF over a 6-month period in three experimental ponds. The gonadosomatic index in females was lower for LVF compared with HVF in one experimental pond. No significant differences in energy stores (measured using body constituent analysis) were observed between LVF and HVF. In addition, both groups were consuming the same prey items as evidenced by stomach content analysis. The inherent reasons behind differential vulnerability to angling are complex, and selection for these opposing phenotypes appears to select for differing growth rates, although the driving factors remain unclear. These traits are important from a life-history perspective, and alterations to their frequency as a result of fishing-induced selection could alter fish population structure. These findings further emphasize the need to incorporate evolutionary principles into fisheries management activities.]]></description>
<dc:publisher><![CDATA[WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC]]></dc:publisher>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Evolutionary Applications]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[3]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[2]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[312]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[323]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/23/2009 7:10:43 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:18:18 AM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15904</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[AUG]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ artificial selection]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ energetics]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ largemouth bass]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ life history]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Micropterus salmoides]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ vulnerability to angling]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ CATCH-AND-RELEASE]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ FISHERIES-INDUCED EVOLUTION]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ TROUT SALMO-TRUTTA]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ SMALLMOUTH BASS]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ BODY-COMPOSITION]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ ATLANTIC SALMON]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ RAPID METHOD]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ GROWTH]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ CONSERVATION]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Evolutionary Biology]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:no><![CDATA[PT: J; NR: 68; TC: 4; J9: EVOL APPL; PG: 12; GA: 505DR]]></refworks:no>
<refworks:pp><![CDATA[MALDEN; COMMERCE PLACE, 350 MAIN ST, MALDEN 02148, MA USA]]></refworks:pp>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[1752-4571]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:ad><![CDATA[[Redpath, Tara D.; Cooke, Steven J.] Carleton Univ, Dept Biol, Fish Ecol & Conservat Physiol Lab, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada. [Cooke, Steven J.; Wahl, David H.; Philipp, David P.] Illinois Nat Hist Survey, Div Ecol & Conservat Sci, Champaign, IL 61820 USA. [Arlinghaus, Robert] Leibniz Inst Freshwater Ecol & Inland Fisheries, Dept Biol & Ecol Fishes, Berlin, Germany. [Arlinghaus, Robert] Humboldt Univ, Fac Agr & Hort, Inland Fisheries Management Lab, Berlin, Germany. [Wahl, David H.] Illinois Nat Hist Survey, Div Ecol & Conservat Sci, Kaskaskia Biol Stn, Sullivan, IL USA. [Philipp, David P.] Univ Illinois, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA.; Redpath, TD, Carleton Univ, Dept Biol, Fish Ecol & Conservat Physiol Lab, 1125 Colonel Dr, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada.; tararedpath@hotmail.com]]></refworks:ad>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:sf><![CDATA[Article]]></refworks:sf>
<refworks:do><![CDATA[10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00078.x]]></refworks:do>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Web of Science]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[10/23/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15904]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>
<refworks:an><![CDATA[000270669700006]]></refworks:an>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15903">
<title><![CDATA[Phosphorylation and the N-terminal extension of the regulatory light chain help orient and align the myosin heads in Drosophila flight muscle]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Farman,G. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Miller,M. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Reedy,M. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Soto-Adames,Felipe N*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Vigoreaux,J. O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Maughan,D. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Irving,T. C.]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[X-ray diffraction of the indirect flight muscle (IFM) in living Drosophila at rest and electron microscopy of intact and glycerinated IFM was used to compare the effects of mutations in the regulatory light chain (RLC) on sarcomeric structure. Truncation of the RLC N-terminal extension (Dmlc2Δ2-46) or disruption of the phosphorylation sites by substituting alanines (Dmlc2S66A, S67A) decreased the equatorial intensity ratio (I20/I10), indicating decreased myosin mass associated with the thin filaments. Phosphorylation site disruption (Dmlc2S66A, S67A), but not N-terminal extension truncation (Dmlc2Δ2-46), decreased the 14.5 nm reflection intensity, indicating a spread of the axial distribution of the myosin heads. The arrangement of thick filaments and myosin heads in electron micrographs of the phosphorylation mutant (Dmlc2S66A, S67A) appeared normal in the relaxed and rigor states, but when calcium activated, fewer myosin heads formed cross-bridges. In transgenic flies with both alterations to the RLC (Dmlc2Δ2-46; S66A, S67A), the effects of the dual mutation were additive. The results suggest that the RLC N-terminal extension serves as a “tether” to help pre-position the myosin heads for attachment to actin, while phosphorylation of the RLC promotes head orientations that allow optimal interactions with the thin filament.]]></description>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Journal of Structural Biology]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[2]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[168]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[240]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[249]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/23/2009 7:02:35 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:16:10 AM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15903</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[November 2009]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ X-ray diffraction]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Cross-bridges]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Myosin regulatory light chain]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Phosphorylation]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Extension]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Work production]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[1047-8477]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:do><![CDATA[DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2009.07.020]]></refworks:do>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Author notification; ScienceDirect]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[10/23/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15903]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>
<refworks:ul><![CDATA[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WM5-4WVF6P4-3/2/202a8a8a67a0a4a9e63a383656a15875]]></refworks:ul>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15900">
<title><![CDATA[Aspects of raccoon life history in west-central Illinois]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nixon,Charles M*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Mankin,P. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Esker,Terry L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Sullivan,J. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Rothering,A. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Bluett,R. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[1-2]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[102]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[117]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[130]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/22/2009 5:21:24 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:18:00 AM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15900</link>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Hand entry from source publication]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15900]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY09]]></refworks:u1>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15897">
<title><![CDATA[Reversible melanization following substrate color reversal in midland painted turtles (Chrysemys picta marginata) and red-eared sliders (Trachemys scripta elegans)]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rowe,John W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Clark,David L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Price,Michael]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Tucker,John K*]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[Some freshwater turtle species show substrate color-convergence of the dorsal integument, thus facilitating crypsis. Because turtles move among aquatic habitats with variable substrate colors, we tested whether melanization was reversible in juvenile Midland Painted Turtles (Chrysemys picta marginata) and Red-Eared Sliders (Trachemys scripta elegans). We reared individuals as controls (those reared on black or white substrates for 160 days) or as reversal treatments (those reared on black or white substrates for 80 days and then reversed treatments from black to white or white to black). Mean intensity (a measure of total reflectance of the visual spectrum) of the third vertebral scute of the carapace (TVSC) and dorsal head skin (DHS) of black substrate control groups declined (turtles darkened) slightly in C. p. marginata but more so in T. s. elegans. In the white substrate control groups, mean intensity of TVSC and DHS increased (turtles lightened) substantially in both species. During the first 80 days in both species, intensity of the TVSC and DHS of black-white and white-black reversal groups largely paralleled the black and white substrate control groups, respectively. Following reversal of substrates in both species, mean TVSC and DHS intensities of the black-white and white-black reversal groups converged with the white and black substrate control groups, respectively. Therefore, reversal of TVSC and DHS melanization was complete, or nearly complete, by day 160. Therefore, it seems plausible that, in both species, reversible melanization could allow substrate color convergence in juveniles that experience different environments with variable substrate colors.]]></description>
<dc:publisher><![CDATA[SOC STUDY AMPHIBIANS REPTILES]]></dc:publisher>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Journal of Herpetology]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[3]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[43]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[402]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[408]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/16/2009 10:35:53 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:18:20 AM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15897</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[SEP]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Phenotypic plasticity]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Beaver Island]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Habitat]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Pigmentation]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Trionychidae]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Movements]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Predation]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Melanism]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:pp><![CDATA[ST LOUIS; C/O ROBERT D ALDRIDGE, ST LOUIS UNIV, DEPT BIOLOGY, 3507 LACLEDE, ST LOUIS, MO 63103 USA]]></refworks:pp>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[0022-1511]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:ad><![CDATA[[Rowe, John W.; Clark, David L.; Price, Michael] Alma Coll, Dept Biol, Alma, MI 48801 USA. [Tucker, John K.] Illinois Nat Hist Survey, Great Rivers Field Stn, Brighton, IL 62012 USA.; Rowe, JW, Alma Coll, Dept Biol, Alma, MI 48801 USA.; rowe@alma.edu]]></refworks:ad>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:sf><![CDATA[Article]]></refworks:sf>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Web of Science]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[10/16/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15897]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>
<refworks:an><![CDATA[000270414400005]]></refworks:an>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15896">
<title><![CDATA[Parallel evolution in the major haemoglobin genes of eight species of Andean waterfowl]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McCracken,K. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Barger,C. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Bulgarella,M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Johnson,Kevin P*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Sonsthagen,S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Trucco,J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Valqui,T. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Wilson,R. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Winker,K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Sorenson,M. D.]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[Theory predicts that parallel evolution should be common when the number of beneficial mutations is limited by selective constraints on protein structure. However, confirmation is scarce in natural populations. Here we studied the major haemoglobin genes of eight Andean duck lineages and compared them to 115 other waterfowl species, including the bar-headed goose (Anser indicus) and Abyssinian blue-winged goose (Cyanochen cyanopterus), two additional species living at high altitude. One to five amino acid replacements were significantly overrepresented or derived in each highland population, and parallel substitutions were more common than in simulated sequences evolved under a neutral model. Two substitutions evolved in parallel in the alpha A subunit of two (Ala-alpha 8) and five (Thr-alpha 77) taxa, and five identical beta A subunit substitutions were observed in two (Ser-beta 4, Glu-beta 94, Met-beta 133) or three (Ser-beta 13, Ser-beta 116) taxa. Substitutions at adjacent sites within the same functional protein region were also observed. Five such replacements were in exterior, solvent-accessible positions on the A helix and AB corner of the alpha A subunit. Five others were in close proximity to inositolpentaphosphate binding sites, and two pairs of independent replacements occurred at two different alpha(1)beta(1) intersubunit contacts. More than half of the substitutions in highland lineages resulted in the acquisition of serine or threonine (18 gains vs. 2 losses), both of which possess a hydroxyl group that can hydrogen bond to a variety of polar substrates. The patterns of parallel evolution observed in these waterfowl suggest that adaptation to high-altitude hypoxia has resulted from selection on unique but overlapping sets of one to five amino acid substitutions in each lineage.]]></description>
<dc:publisher><![CDATA[WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC]]></dc:publisher>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Molecular Ecology]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[19]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[18]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[3992]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[4005]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/15/2009 9:10:46 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:18:00 AM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15896</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[OCT]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Altiplano]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Anatidae]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ haemoglobin]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ high-altitude hypoxia]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ oxygen affinity]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ parallel evolution]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Patagonia]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Waterfowl]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Bar-headed goose]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Phylogenetic analysis]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Molecular adaptation]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Adaptive melanism]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:pp><![CDATA[MALDEN; COMMERCE PLACE, 350 MAIN ST, MALDEN 02148, MA USA]]></refworks:pp>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[0962-1083]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:ad><![CDATA[[McCracken, K. G.; Barger, C. P.; Bulgarella, M.; Sonsthagen, S. A.; Wilson, R. E.; Winker, K.] Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Inst Arctic Biol, Dept Biol & Wildlife, Fairbanks, AK 99775 USA. [McCracken, K. G.; Barger, C. P.; Bulgarella, M.; Sonsthagen, S. A.; Wilson, R. E.; Winker, K.] Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Univ Alaska Museum, Fairbanks, AK 99775 USA. [Johnson, K. P.] Illinois Nat Hist Survey, Champaign, IL 61820 USA. [Trucco, J.] Patagonia Outfitters, RA-8370 San Martin, Neuquen, Argentina. [Valqui, T. H.] CORBIDI, Lima 33, Peru. [Valqui, T. H.] Louisiana State Univ, Museum Nat Sci, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA. [Sorenson, M. D.] Boston Univ, Dept Biol, Boston, MA 02215 USA.; McCracken, KG, Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Inst Arctic Biol, Dept Biol & Wildlife, Fairbanks, AK 99775 USA.; fnkgm@uaf.edu]]></refworks:ad>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:sf><![CDATA[Article]]></refworks:sf>
<refworks:do><![CDATA[10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04352.x]]></refworks:do>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Web of Science]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[10/15/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15896]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>
<refworks:an><![CDATA[000270079100006]]></refworks:an>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15894">
<title><![CDATA[A new pygmy mole cricket in cretaceous amber from Burma (Orthoptera: Tridactylidae).]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heads,Sam W*]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[A new genus and species of Tridactylidae (Orthoptera: Caelifera: Tridactyloidea) is described from mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber. Burmadactylus grimaldii gen. et sp.nov. is the first tridactylid to be formally described from a Cretaceous amber and is assigned to the extant subfamily Dentridactylinae. The new genus is distinguished from all other Dentridactylinae by unusually small male paraproctal lobes and represents the first record of an extant tridactylid subfamily from the Mesozoic. A key to the genera of Dentridactylinae is also provided.]]></description>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Denisia]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[26]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[75]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[82]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/2/2009 3:37:23 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:02:08 PM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15894</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[2 April 2009]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Burmadactylus]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Burmadactylus grimaldii]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Dentridactylinae]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Tridactylidae]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Arthropods]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Insects]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Invertebrates]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Saltatoria]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ fossils]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ amber]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Keys]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Orthoptera]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[1608-8700]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:ad><![CDATA[Heads, Sam W.; Palaeontology Research Group, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom; sam.heads@port.ac.uk]]></refworks:ad>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:sf><![CDATA[Article]]></refworks:sf>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Author notification; Web of Knowledge]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[10/2/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15894]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY09]]></refworks:u1>
<refworks:an><![CDATA[ZOOR14509058546; ZOOREC:ZOOR14509058546]]></refworks:an>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15893">
<title><![CDATA[New pygmy grasshoppers in miocene amber from the Dominican Republic (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae).]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heads,Sam W*]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[Two new pygmy grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae: Cladonotinae) are described from specimens preserved in Early Miocene (Burdigalian) amber from the Dominican Republic. Antillotettix electrum sp.nov. and Baeotettix lottiae gen. et sp.nov. are the first tetrigids to be described from Dominican amber. An updated list of tetrigid species known from the West Indies is provided.]]></description>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Denisia]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[26]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[69]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[74]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/2/2009 3:35:31 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:02:31 PM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15893</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[2 April 2009]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Antillotettix electrum]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Baeotettix lottiae]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Amber]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Miocene]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Baeotettix]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Tetrigidae]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Checklists]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Arthropods]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Insects]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Invertebrates]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Saltatoria]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Cladonotinae]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Fossils]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:no><![CDATA[PT: J
ME: Print
BD: Systematics; Nomenclature; New taxa; Documentation; Publications; Land
   zones; Neotropical region; Central America; West Indies; Geological
   time periods; Caenozoic; Tertiary; Neogene
ST: Animalia, Arthropoda, Insecta, Orthoptera, Saltatoria]]></refworks:no>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[1608-8700]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:ad><![CDATA[Heads, Sam W.; Palaeontology Research Group, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom; sam.heads@port.ac.uk]]></refworks:ad>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:sf><![CDATA[Article]]></refworks:sf>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Author notification; Web of Knowledge]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[10/2/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15893]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY09]]></refworks:u1>
<refworks:an><![CDATA[ZOOR14509058545; ZOOREC:ZOOR14509058545]]></refworks:an>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15892">
<title><![CDATA[New Tridactyloidea in Miocene amber from the Dominican Republic (Orthoptera:  Caelifera)]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heads,Sam W*]]></dc:creator>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Annales de la Société Entomologique de France]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[[Article in press]]]></prism:volume> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/2/2009 3:32:36 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/2/2009 3:32:53 PM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15892</link>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[author notification]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15892]]></refworks:id>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15891">
<title><![CDATA[The first fossil spider cricket (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Phalangopsinae): 20  million years of troglobiomorphosis or exaptation in the dark?]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heads,Sam W*]]></dc:creator>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[[Article in press]]]></prism:volume> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[10/2/2009 3:31:15 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/2/2009 3:31:59 PM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15891</link>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[author notification]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15891]]></refworks:id>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15889">
<title><![CDATA[The discovery of the nonindigenous, mottled fingernail clam, Eupera cubensis (Prime, 1865) (Bivalvia: Sphaeriidae) in the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal (Illinois River drainage), Cook County, Illinois]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sneen,Martin E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Cummings,Kevin S*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Minarik Jr.,Thomas]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Wasik,Jennifer]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[The nonindigenous mottled fingernail clam, Eupera cubensis is reported from the Upper Mississippi River Basin for the first time. This record represents a significant northern range expansion for the species in the United States. It appears to be presently confined to a 35-km stretch of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal (CSSC), an artificial waterway that connects the Mississippi River drainage to the Great Lakes. Although the introduction of this species to the Great Lakes basin poses uncertain risks to the general aquatic community, the immediate effects of Eupera cubensis on the fauna of the CSSC are expected to be minimal.]]></description>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Journal of Great Lakes Research]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[4]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[35]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[627]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[629]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[9/30/2009 9:24:47 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[11/20/2009 8:41:59 PM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15889</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[December 2009; Available online 29 September 2009.]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Eupera cubensis]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Nonindigenous species]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Illinois River]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[0380-1330]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:do><![CDATA[DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2009.08.008]]></refworks:do>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[ScienceDirect]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[9/30/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15889]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>
<refworks:ul><![CDATA[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B984D-4XBF8WF-1/2/6341cc39b892264719fa27e360f3c69c]]></refworks:ul>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15890">
<title><![CDATA[Patterns of forest succession and impacts of flood in the Upper Mississippi River floodplain ecosystem]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yin,Yao]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Wu,Yegang]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Bartell,Steve M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Cosgriff,Robert J*]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[The widespread loss of oak-hickory forests and the impacts of flood have been major issues of ecological interest concerning forest succession in the Upper Mississippi River (UMR) floodplain. The data analysis from two comprehensive field surveys indicated that Quercus was one of the dominant genera in the UMR floodplain ecosystem prior to the 1993 flood and constituted 14% of the total number of trees and 28% of the total basal area. During the post-flood recovery period through 2006, Quercus demonstrated slower recovery rates in both the number of trees (4%) and basal area (17%). In the same period, Carya recovered greatly from the 1993 flood in terms of the number of trees (11%) and basal area (2%), compared to its minor status before the flood. Further analyses suggested that different species responded to the 1993 flood with varying tolerance and different succession strategies. In this study, the relation of flood-caused mortality rates and DBH, fm(d), can be expressed in negative exponential functions for each species. The results of this research also indicate that the growth functions are different for each species and might also be different between pre- and post-flood time periods. These functions indicate different survival strategies and emergent properties in responding to flood impacts. This research enhances our understanding of forest succession patterns in space and time in the UPR floodplain. And such understanding might be used to predict long-term impacts of floods on UMR floodplain forest dynamics in support of management and restoration.]]></description>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Ecological Complexity]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[In Press, Corrected Proof]]></prism:volume> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[9/30/2009 9:24:47 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[9/30/2009 9:29:57 PM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15890</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[Available online 24 September 2009]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Upper Mississippi River floodplain ecosystem]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Oak-hickory forest succession]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Spatial and temporal patterns]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[1476-945X]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:do><![CDATA[DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.08.004]]></refworks:do>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[ScienceDirect]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[9/30/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15890]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:ul><![CDATA[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B7CRV-4X9D5DJ-1/2/81cb3e52a931c5072d9e07912c9f9ab5]]></refworks:ul>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15888">
<title><![CDATA[Identifying predators clarifies predictors of nest success in a temperate passerine [article in press]]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benson,Thomas J*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Brown,J. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Bednarz,J. C.]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[Nest predation negatively affects most avian populations. Studies of nest predation usually group all nest failures when attempting to determine temporal and parental activities, habitat or landscape predictors of success. Often these studies find few significant predictors and interpret patterns as essentially random.  Relatively little is known about the importance of individual predator species or groups on observed patterns of nest success, and how the ecology of these predators may influence patterns of success and failure.  In 2006 and 2007, time-lapse, infrared video systems were deployed at nests of Swainson's warblers (Limnothlypis swainsonii Audubon) in east-central Arkansas to identify dominant nest predators and determine whether factors predicting predation differed among these predators.  Analysis of pooled data yielded few predictors of predation risk, whereas separate analyses for the three major predator groups revealed clear, but often conflicting, patterns.  Predation by ratsnakes (Elaphe obsoleta) and raptors was more common during the nestling period, whereas predation by brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) occurred more during incubation. Additionally, the risk of predation by raptors and cowbirds decreased throughout the breeding season, whereas ratsnake predation risk increased.  Contrary to expectations, predation by ratsnakes and cowbirds was more common far from edges, whereas raptor predation was more common close to agricultural edges.  Collectively, our results suggest that associating specific predators with the nests they prey on is necessary to understand underlying mechanisms.]]></description>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[The Journal of Animal Ecology]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<refworks:created><![CDATA[9/30/2009 9:11:55 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[9/30/2009 9:30:44 PM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15888</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[available online Jul 31 2009]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ avian demography]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ nest predators]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ predation risk]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ predator-specific patterns]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Swainson's warbler]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Limnothlypis swainsonii]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[1365-2656]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:ad><![CDATA[Department of Biological Sciences and Environmental Sciences Program, Arkansas State University, P.O. Box 599, Jonesboro, AR 72467, USA.]]></refworks:ad>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[ENG]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:sf><![CDATA[JOURNAL ARTICLE]]></refworks:sf>
<refworks:do><![CDATA[10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01604.x]]></refworks:do>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[author notification; PubMed]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[9/30/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15888]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:ul><![CDATA[http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122528323/abstract]]></refworks:ul>
<refworks:wp><![CDATA[20090731]]></refworks:wp>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15887">
<title><![CDATA[Vegetation characteristics of Swainson's warbler habitat at the White River National Wildlife Refuge, Arkansas]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brown,Jeremy D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Benson,Thomas J*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Bednarz,James C.]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[The Swainson's warbler (Limnothlypis swainsonii Audubon) is a species of concern within forested wetlands across the southeastern U.S. Previous studies involving low-elevation sites may not have adequately represented the habitat affinities of this species. We examined relationships between Swainson's warbler occupancy and vegetation structure at relatively high-elevation bottomlands at White River National Wildlife Refuge (WRNWR). In 2004 and 2005, we systematically surveyed 1453 sites and collected vegetation data at 70 occupied sites (< 5% occupancy) and 106 randomly selected unoccupied sites. Occupied sites had greater canopy cover, density of cane (Arundinaria gigantea Walt. Chapm.) and shrub stems, litter depth, and greater and more uniform understory vegetation density than unoccupied sites. Moreover, cane and understory vegetation density were associated with more persistent habitat use. Ultimately, cane stem density was the best predictor of Swainson's warbler occupancy with an AIC(c) weight of 99% over all models considered. Overall, our results suggest that cane, dense understory structure, and a well-developed leaf-litter layer are key habitat components for Swainson's warblers at WRNWR. These findings are especially relevant given the substantial decline of canebrakes throughout the Southeast. Swainson's warbler management should include enhancement of canebrakes via manipulations that mimic natural disturbances.]]></description>
<dc:publisher><![CDATA[SOC WETLAND SCIENTISTS]]></dc:publisher>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Wetlands]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[2]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[29]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[586]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[597]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[9/28/2009 5:18:15 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:15:44 AM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15887</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[JUN]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Arundinaria gigantea]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ bottomland hardwood forest]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ canebrakes]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ floodplain]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ leaf litter]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Limnothlypis swainsonii]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ understory density]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ SELECTION]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ FOREST]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Ecology]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Environmental Sciences]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:pp><![CDATA[LAWRENCE; 810 E TENTH ST, P O BOX 1897, LAWRENCE, KS 66044 USA]]></refworks:pp>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[0277-5212]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:ad><![CDATA[[Bednarz, James C.] Arkansas State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Jonesboro, AR 72467 USA.; Brown, JD, Arkansas Game & Fish Commiss, 2920 McClellan Dr, Jonesboro, AR 72401 USA.; brahmabull_jb@yahoo.com]]></refworks:ad>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:sf><![CDATA[Article]]></refworks:sf>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Author notification; Web of Knowledge]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[9/28/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15887]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY09]]></refworks:u1>
<refworks:an><![CDATA[000268987300017]]></refworks:an>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15886">
<title><![CDATA[Estimating territory and home-range sizes: do singing locations alone provide an accurate estimate of space use?]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anich,Nicholas M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Benson,Thomas J*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Bednarz,James C.]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[Documenting space-use patterns of animals is important for understanding their ecology and providing for their conservation. The concept of territory refers to a defended area, whereas the concept of home range refers to any area used by an animal during its normal activities. Few studies have explored quantitatively how these areas differ, and the use of these terms in the literature has, at times, been inconsistent. Many studies attempt to estimate territory size of a bird by territory mapping, which involves using locations obtained by following a singing bird. This is often assumed to be an effective measure of territory size, but few studies have examined the efficacy of this technique. Here, we used radiotelemetry to estimate breeding home-range and territory sizes of Swainson's Warbler (Limnothlypis swainsonii), a Neotropical migrant songbird. We found that territories were much larger than had been estimated by territory-mapping methods and suggest that researchers use caution when assuming that territory mapping accounts for all areas used by a bird. We also found that home ranges were significantly larger than territories, and these relatively large home ranges necessitate protection of large areas of habitat for Swainson's Warblers. We emphasize the importance of precise terminology when referring to areas of space use and suggest that radiotracking may uncover previously unknown use patterns and important ecological information in species that have not been radiotracked. Received 28 October 2008, accepted 18 March 2009.]]></description>
<dc:publisher><![CDATA[AMER ORNITHOLOGISTS UNION]]></dc:publisher>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Auk]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[3]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[126]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[626]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[634]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[9/28/2009 5:16:38 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:15:44 AM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15886</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[JUL]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ home-range size]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Limnothlypis swainsonii]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ radiotelemetry]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ spot mapping]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Swainson's Warbler]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ territory mapping]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ territory size]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ SWAINSONS WARBLER]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ RADIO TELEMETRY]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ HOODED WARBLERS]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ DENSITY]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ PASSERINES]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ BEHAVIOR]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ FOREST]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ BIRDS]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ TRANSMITTERS]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ FORAYS]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Ornithology]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:no><![CDATA[PT: J; NR: 56; TC: 0; J9: AUK; PG: 9; GA: 484BY]]></refworks:no>
<refworks:pp><![CDATA[LAWRENCE; ORNITHOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMER PO BOX 1897, LAWRENCE, KS 66044-8897 USA]]></refworks:pp>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[0004-8038]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:ad><![CDATA[[Anich, Nicholas M.; Benson, Thomas J.; Bednarz, James C.] Arkansas State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Jonesboro, AR 72467 USA.; Anich, NM, 2414 Fellman Circle, Ashland, WI 54806 USA.; nicholas.m.anich@gmail.com]]></refworks:ad>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:sf><![CDATA[Article]]></refworks:sf>
<refworks:do><![CDATA[10.1525/auk.2009.08219]]></refworks:do>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Author notification; Web of Knowledge]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[9/28/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15886]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>
<refworks:an><![CDATA[000269019500016]]></refworks:an>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15885">
<title><![CDATA[The effects of epibenthic communities on reef fishes in the northern Gulf of Mexico]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redman,Rebecca A*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Szedlmayer,S. T.]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[P>Reef fishes were compared between artificial reefs with (n = 20) and without (n = 20) epibenthic communities in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Artificial reefs were built in June 2003; half were coated with copper-based paint to prevent epibenthic community development. Reefs were surveyed by SCUBA divers to estimate fish abundance in the autumn and winter 2003 and spring 2004. Total fish abundance and abundance of red snapper, Lutjanus campechanus (Poey), and gray triggerfish, Balistes capriscus Gmelin, were significantly (P < 0.05) higher on reefs with epibenthic communities. In the spring 2004, the abundance of belted sandfish, Serranus subligarius (Cope), the size of red snapper and community measures of diversity and evenness were significantly (P < 0.05) greater on unpainted reefs. These significant differences provide evidence that reef fishes were positively affected by the presence of epibenthic organisms that probably provided increased food resources.]]></description>
<dc:publisher><![CDATA[WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC]]></dc:publisher>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Fisheries Management and Ecology]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[5]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[16]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[360]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[367]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[9/28/2009 3:54:01 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:18:18 AM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15885</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[OCT]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ artificial reefs]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ food limitation]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ gray triggerfish]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ recruitment]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ red snapper]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ reef fish]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ AGGREGATING DEVICES FADS]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ JUVENILE RED SNAPPER]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ LIFE-HISTORY]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ LUTJANUS-CAMPECHANUS]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ HABITAT COMPLEXITY]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ PUGET SOUND]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ PATTERNS]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ ASSEMBLAGES]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ SIZE]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Fisheries]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:pp><![CDATA[MALDEN; COMMERCE PLACE, 350 MAIN ST, MALDEN 02148, MA USA]]></refworks:pp>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[0969-997X]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:ad><![CDATA[[Szedlmayer, S. T.] Auburn Univ, Dept Fisheries & Allied Aquacultures, Fairhope, AL 36532 USA. [Redman, R. A.] Univ Illinois, Illinois Nat Hist Survey, Lake Michigan Biol Stn, Zion, IL USA.; Szedlmayer, ST, Auburn Univ, Dept Fisheries & Allied Aquacultures, 8300 State Highway 104, Fairhope, AL 36532 USA.; szedlst@auburn.edu]]></refworks:ad>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:sf><![CDATA[Article]]></refworks:sf>
<refworks:do><![CDATA[10.1111/j.1365-2400.2009.00684.x]]></refworks:do>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Web of Science]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[9/28/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15885]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>
<refworks:an><![CDATA[000269730100003]]></refworks:an>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15884">
<title><![CDATA[Therevidae (Stiletto Flies)]]></title>
<refworks:t2><![CDATA[Manual of Central American Diptera]]></refworks:t2>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gaimari,S. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Webb,Donald W*]]></dc:creator>
<refworks:a2><![CDATA[Brown,B. V.]]></refworks:a2>
<dc:publisher><![CDATA[National Research Council Research Press]]></dc:publisher>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Book, Section]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[Chapter 46]]></prism:number>
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[633]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[647]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[9/28/2009 1:55:33 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:16:10 AM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15884</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[Record added to OCLC January 2009]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:pp><![CDATA[Ottawa, Canada]]></refworks:pp>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[9780660198330; 0660198339]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Author notification]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15884]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY09]]></refworks:u1>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15883">
<title><![CDATA[Low metabolism and inactive lifestyle of a tropical rain forest bird investigated via heart-rate telemetry]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steiger,Silke S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Kelley,J. Patrick]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Cochran,William W*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Wikelski,Martin]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[Birds in the lowland tropical rain forest are expected to have low energy turnover. Here, we used heart rate telemetry to estimate nighttime resting metabolic rate (RMR), daily energy expenditure (DEE), and locomotor activity of a small, long-lived tropical rain forest-understory bird, the spotted antbird (Hylophylax naevioides). Heart rate was linearly related to oxygen consumption in respirometry measurements that encompassed 96% of heart rates measured in wild birds. Heart rates in the wild ranged from 260 beats/min at night to 824 beats/min during the day, with a mean of 492 beats/min. Compared with temperate-forest birds of similar body mass, wild spotted antbirds had a low DEE, only 51% of the expected value. Such low metabolism was achieved mainly by being locomotively inactive for 35% of the daytime (i.e., 0 hops or flights/min). On average, spotted antbirds exhibited 1.6 hops or short flights/min during the daytime. In addition, they decreased nighttime RMR in the wild (at ambient temperatures below their thermoneutral zone [TNZ]) to levels equivalent to nighttime RMR in the laboratory at temperatures within their TNZ. This suggests that wild birds reduce their body temperature every night. Our data confirm and extend previous studies showing that tropical passerines have low metabolic rates.]]></description>
<dc:publisher><![CDATA[UNIV CHICAGO PRESS]]></dc:publisher>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Physiological and Biochemical Zoology]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[5]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[82]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[580]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[589]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[9/25/2009 6:43:36 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:18:21 AM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15883</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[SEP-OCT]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ DOUBLY LABELED WATER]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ DAILY ENERGY-EXPENDITURE]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ OXYGEN-CONSUMPTION]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ NOCTURNAL HYPOTHERMIA]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ INDIRECT CALORIMETRY]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ MACARONI PENGUINS]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ SLOW]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ PACE]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ ENERGETICS]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ ALLOMETRY]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ ECOLOGY]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Physiology]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Zoology]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:pp><![CDATA[CHICAGO; 1427 E 60TH ST, CHICAGO, IL 60637-2954 USA]]></refworks:pp>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[1522-2152]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:ad><![CDATA[[Steiger, Silke S.; Kelley, J. Patrick; Wikelski, Martin] Princeton Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA. [Cochran, William W.] Illinois Nat Hist Survey, Champaign, IL 61821 USA. [Wikelski, Martin] Max Planck Inst Ornithol, Dept Migrat & Immunoecol, D-78315 Radolfzell am Bodensee, Germany.; Wikelski, M, Princeton Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Guyot Hall 403, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA.; martin@orn.mpg.de]]></refworks:ad>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:sf><![CDATA[Article]]></refworks:sf>
<refworks:do><![CDATA[10.1086/605336]]></refworks:do>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Web of Science]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15883]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>
<refworks:an><![CDATA[000269741700017]]></refworks:an>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15882">
<title><![CDATA[Nonnative Fishes in the Upper Mississippi River System]]></title>
<refworks:t2><![CDATA[Scientific Investigations  Report]]></refworks:t2>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Irons,Kevin S*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ DeLain,S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Gittinger,Eric J*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Ickes,B. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Kolar,C. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Ostendorf,David]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Ratcliff,E. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Benson,A. J.]]></dc:creator>
<refworks:a2><![CDATA[Irons,Kevin S.]]></refworks:a2>
<description><![CDATA[The introduction, spread, and establishment of nonnative species is  widely regarded as a leading threat to aquatic biodiversity and  consequently is ranked among the most serious environmental problems  facing the United States today. This report presents information on  nonnative fish species observed by the Long Term Resource Monitoring  Program on the Upper Mississippi River System a nexus of North American  freshwater fish diversity for the Nation. The Long Term Resource  Monitoring Program, as part of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’  Environmental Management Plan, is the Nation’s largest river monitoring  program and stands as the primary source of standardized ecological  information on the Upper Mississippi River System. The Long Term  Resource Monitoring Program has been monitoring fish communities in six  study areas on the Upper Mississippi River System since 1989. During  this period, more than 3.5 million individual fish, consisting of 139  species, have been collected. Although fish monitoring activities of  the Long Term Resource Monitoring Program focus principally on entire  fish communities, data collected by the Program are useful for  detecting and monitoring the establishment and spread of nonnative fish  species within the Upper Mississippi River System Basin. Sixteen taxa  of nonnative fishes, or hybrids thereof, have been observed by the Long  Term Resource Monitoring Program since 1989, and several species are  presently expanding their distribution and increasing in abundance. For  example, in one of the six study areas monitored by the Long Term  Resource Monitoring Program, the number of established nonnative  species has increased from two to eight species in less than 10 years.  Furthermore, contributions of those eight species can account for up to  60 percent of the total annual catch and greater than 80 percent of the  observed biomass. These observations are critical because the Upper  Mississippi River System stands as a nationally significant pathway for  nonnative species expansion between the Mississippi River and the Great  Lakes Basin. This report presents a synthesis of data on nonnative fish  species observed during Long Term Resource Monitoring Program  monitoring activities.]]></description>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Report]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[SIR 2009–5176]]></prism:volume> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[9/21/2009 10:05:32 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:38:41 AM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15882</link>
<refworks:no><![CDATA[Prepared by the Long Term Resource Monitoring Program with science  direction from the USGS Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center in  cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Rock Island District]]></refworks:no>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15882]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:ul><![CDATA[http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009/5176/]]></refworks:ul>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15881">
<title><![CDATA[Evolutionary limits ameliorate the negative impact of an invasive plant]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lankau,Richard A*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Nuzzo,Victoria]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Spyreas,Greg*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Davis,Adam S.]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[Invasive species can quickly transform biological communities due to their high abundance and strong impacts on native species, in part because they can be released from the ecological forces that limit native populations. However, little is known about the long-term dynamics of invasions; do invaders maintain their dominant status over long time spans, or do new ecological and evolutionary forces eventually develop to limit their populations? Alliaria petiolata is a Eurasian species that aggressively invades North American forest understories, in part due to the production of toxic phytochemicals. Here we document a marked decline in its phytotoxin production and a consequent decline in their impact on three native species, across a 50+ year chronosequence of Alliaria petiolata invasion. Genetic evidence suggests that these patterns result from natural selection for decreased phytotoxin production rather than founder effects during introduction and spread. These patterns are consistent with the finding of slowing A. petiolata population growth and rebounding native species abundance across a separate chronosequence in Illinois, U. S. These results suggest that this invader is developing evolutionary limits in its introduced range and highlight the importance of understanding the long-term processes that shape species invasions and their impacts.]]></description>
<dc:publisher><![CDATA[NATL ACAD SCIENCES]]></dc:publisher>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[36]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[106]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[15362]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[15367]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[9/18/2009 8:24:54 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:16:32 AM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15881</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[SEP 8 2009]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ allelopathy]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Alliaria petiolata]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ genetic diversity]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ glucosinolates]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ plant-soil feedbacks]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ ALLIARIA-PETIOLATA]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ GARLIC MUSTARD]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ COMPETITIVE ABILITY]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ HERBIVORES]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ COMMUNITY]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ GENETICS]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ MARKERS]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ WEAPONS]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ TOADS]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ TIME]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Multidisciplinary Sciences]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:no><![CDATA[PT: J; NR: 39; TC: 0; J9: PROC NAT ACAD SCI USA; PG: 6; GA: 492CR]]></refworks:no>
<refworks:pp><![CDATA[WASHINGTON; 2101 CONSTITUTION AVE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20418 USA]]></refworks:pp>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[0027-8424]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:ad><![CDATA[[Lankau, Richard A.; Spyreas, Greg] Univ Illinois Urbana Champaign, Inst Nat Resource Sustainabil, Illinois Nat Hist Survey, Champaign, IL 61820 USA. [Nuzzo, Victoria] Nat Area Consultants, Richford, NY 13835 USA. [Davis, Adam S.] USDA ARS, Invas Weed Management Unit, Urbana, IL 61801 USA.; Lankau, RA, Univ Illinois Urbana Champaign, Inst Nat Resource Sustainabil, Illinois Nat Hist Survey, 1816 S Oak St, Champaign, IL 61820 USA.; ralankau@illinois.edu]]></refworks:ad>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:sf><![CDATA[Article]]></refworks:sf>
<refworks:do><![CDATA[10.1073/pnas.0905446106]]></refworks:do>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Web of Science]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[9/18/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15881]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15859">
<title><![CDATA[Characterization of a new insect cell line (NTU-YB) derived from the common grass yellow butterfly, Eurema hecabe (Linnaeus) (Pieridae: Lepidoptera) and its susceptibility to microsporidia [Article in press]]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen,Yun-Ru]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Solter,Leellen*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Chien,Tsz-Ying]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Jiang,Ming-Han]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Lin,Hsieh-Fang]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Fan,Huai-Sheng]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Lo,Chu-Fang]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Wang,Chung-Hsiung]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[A new lepidopteran cell line, NTU-YB, was derived from pupal tissue of Eurema hecabe (Linnaeus) (Pieridae: Lepidoptera). The doubling time of YB cells in TNM-FH medium supplemented with 8% FBS at 28°C was 26.87 hours. The chromosome numbers of YB cells varied widely from 21 to 196 with a mean of 86. Compared to other insect cell lines, the YB cells produced distinct esterase, malate dehydrogenase, and lactate dehydrogenase isozyme patterns. Identity of the internal transcribed spacer region-I (ITS-I) of YB cells to E. hecabe larvae was 96% and to E. blanda larvae (tissue isolated from head) was 81%. The YB cells were permissive to Nosema sp. isolated from E. blanda and the infected YB cells showed obvious cytopathic effects after 3 weeks post inoculation. The highest level of spore production was at 4 weeks post inoculation when cells were infected with the Nosema isolate, and spore production was 1.34 ± 0.9 × 106 spore/ml. Ultrastructrual studies showed that YB cells can host in vitro propagation of the E. blanda Nosema isolate, and developing stages were observed in the host cell nuclei as observed in the natural host, E. blanda. The NTU-YB cell line is also susceptible to Nosema bombycis.]]></description>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Journal of invertebrate pathology]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<refworks:created><![CDATA[9/15/2009 9:42:57 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 1:52:10 AM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15859</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[Available online 15 September 2009]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Eurema blanda]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Eurema hecabe]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ microsporidia]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ NTU-YB cell line]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Nosema sp]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[0022-2011]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:do><![CDATA[DOI: 10.1016/j.jip.2009.09.003]]></refworks:do>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[ScienceDirect]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[9/15/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15859]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:ul><![CDATA[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WJV-4X7GMPT-1/2/b2f96b452848c1c646e73092d2e427d5]]></refworks:ul>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15858">
<title><![CDATA[Identifying across-system sources of variation in a generalist freshwater fish: correlates of total and size-specific abundance of yellow perch]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carey,Michael P*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Mather,M. E.]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[Variation in fish abundance across systems presents a challenge to our understanding of fish populations because it limits our ability to predict and transfer basic ecological principles to applied problems. Yellow perch (Perca flavescens) is an ideal species for exploring environmental and biotic correlates across system because it is widely distributed and physiologically tolerant. In 16 small, adjacent systems that span a wide range of environmental and biotic conditions, yellow perch were sampled with a standard suite of gear. Water quality, morphometry, vegetation, invertebrates and fish communities were concurrently measured. Multimodel inference was used to prioritise regressors for the entire yellow perch sample and three size groups (35-80, 81-180, ≥181 mm TL). Across systems, pH and fish richness were identified as the key drivers of yellow perch abundance. At very low pH (4.8) had many other species and few yellow perch. Similar patterns for pH and fish community were observed for the two largest-size classes. Negative interactions were observed between the medium- and large-sized yellow perch and between the largest and smallest yellow perch, although interspecific interactions were weaker than expected. This examination of variability for an indicator species and its component-size classes provides ecological understanding that can help frame the larger-scale sampling programs needed for the conservation of freshwater fish. © 2008 Blackwell Munksgaard.]]></description>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Ecology of Freshwater Fish]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[1]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[18]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[145]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[155]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[9/14/2009 1:13:22 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/30/2009 10:04:58 PM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15858</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[March 2009]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Comparative approach]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Fish community]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ PH gradient]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Yellow perch]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[09066691]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:ad><![CDATA[Affiliation: USGS Department of Natural Resources Conservation, Holdsworth Natural Resources Center, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, United States; Affiliation: USGS Department of Natural Resources Conservation, Holdsworth Natural Resources Center, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, United States; Affiliation: Division of Ecology and Conservation Science, Illinois Natural History Survey, MC652, 1816 S. Oak St, Champaign, IL 61820, United States; Correspondence Address: Carey, M. P.; Division of Ecology and Conservation Science, Illinois Natural History Survey, MC652, 1816 S. Oak St, Champaign, IL 61820, United States; email: mpcarey@uiuc.edu]]></refworks:ad>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:do><![CDATA[10.1111/j.1600-0633.2008.00335.x]]></refworks:do>
<refworks:db><![CDATA[SCOPUS]]></refworks:db>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Scopus]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[14 September 2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15858]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY09]]></refworks:u1>
<refworks:ul><![CDATA[http://www.scopus.com.proxy2.library.uiuc.edu/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-69249083693&partnerID=40]]></refworks:ul>
<refworks:cr><![CDATA[Baker, J.P., Christensen, S.W., Acidic deposition and aquatic ecosystems: Regional case studies (1991) Acidic Deposition and Aquatic Ecosystems: Regional Case Studies, pp. 83-106. , Charles, D.F. Christies, S. eds. New York, NY, USA. Springer-Verlag;; Becker, G.C., (1983) Fishes of Wisconsin, , Madison, Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press;; Benson, B.J., Magnuson, J.J., Spatial heterogeneity of littoral fish assemblages in lakes: Relation to species diversity and habitat structure (1992) Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 49, pp. 1493-1500;; Bertolo, A., Magnan, P., The relationship between piscivory and growth of white sucker (Catostomus commersoni) and yellow perch (Perca flavescens) in headwater lakes of the Canadian Shield (2005) Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 62, pp. 2706-2715;; Borcherding, J., Hermasch, B., Murawski, P., Field observations and laboratory experiments on growth and lipid content of young-of-the-year perch (2007) Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 16, pp. 198-209;; Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., (1998) Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-theoretic Approach, , New York. Springer;; Carey, M.P., (2002) Evaluating Patterns and Processes of Community Structure Along A Gradient of Variables: Context-specific Mechanisms That Impact Yellow Perch, , Masters thesis. Amherst, MA, USA. University of Massachusetts;; Carey, M.P., Mather, M.E., Tracking change in a human-dominated landscape: Developing conservation guidelines using freshwater fish Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 18, pp. 877-890;; Carol, J., Benejam, L., Alcaraz, C., Vila-Gispert, A., Zamora, L., Navarro, E., Armengol, J., Garcia-Berthou, E., The effects of limnological features on fish assemblages of 14 Spanish reservoirs (2006) Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 15, pp. 66-77;; Clapp, D.F., Dettmers, J.M., Yellow perch research and management in Lake Michigan: Evaluating progress in a cooperative effort, 1997-2001 (2004) Fisheries, 29, pp. 11-19;; Cobb, S.E., Watzin, M.C., Trophic interactions between yellow perch (Perca flavescens) and their benthic prey in a littoral zone community (1998) Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 55, pp. 28-36;; Degerman, E., Appelberg, M., Nyberg, P., Effects of liming on the occurrence and abundance of fish populations in acidified Swedish lakes (1992) Hydrobiologia, 230, pp. 203-212;; Dettmers, J.M., Janssen, J., Pientka, B., Fulford, R.S., Jude, D.S., Evidence across multiple scales for offshore transport of yellow perch (Perca flavescens) larvae in Lake Michigan (2005) Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 62, pp. 2683-2693;; Diehl, S., Fish predation and benthic community structure: The role of omnivory and habitat complexity (1993) Ecology, 73, pp. 1646-1661;; Eaton, J.G., Swenson, W.A., McCormick, J.H., Simonson, T.D., Jensen, K.M., A field and laboratory investigation of acid effects on largemouth bass, rock bass, black crappie, and yellow perch (1992) Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 121, pp. 644-658;; Godfrey, P.J., Galluzzo, K., Price, N., Portnoy, J.W., (1999) Water Resources Management Plan: Cape Cod National Seashore, p. 243. , Wellfleet, MA, USA. Cape Cod National Seashore, National Park Service, U.S. Department of Interior;; Haines, T.A., Acidic precipitation and its consequences for aquatic ecosystems: A review (1981) Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 110, pp. 669-707;; Hayes, D.B., Taylor, W.W., Reproductive strategy in yellow perch (Perca flavescens): Effects of diet ontogeny, mortality, and survival costs (1990) Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 47, pp. 921-927;; Hayes, D.B., Taylor, W.W., Schneider, J.C., Response of yellow perch and the benthic invertebrate community to a reduction in the abundance of white suckers (1992) Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 121, pp. 36-53;; Heibo, E., Vøllestad, L.A., Life-history variation in perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) in five neighbouring Norwegian lakes (2002) Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 11, pp. 270-280;; Hesthegan, T., Berger, H.M., Schartau, A.K.T., Nost, T., Saksgard, R., Floystad, L., Low success rate in re-establishing European perch in some highly acidified lakes in southernmost Norway (2001) Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 130, pp. 1361-1366;; Holmgren, K., Appelberg, M., Size structure of benthic freshwater fish communities in relation to environmental gradients (2000) Journal of Fish Biology, 57, pp. 1312-1330;; Holmgren, K., Appelberg, M., Effects of environmental factors on size-related growth efficiency of perch, Perca fluviatilis (2001) Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 10, pp. 247-256;; Horppila, J., Ruuhijarvi, J., Rask, M., Karppinen, C., Nyberg, K., Olin, M., Seasonal changes in the diets and relative abundances of perch and roach in the littoral and pelagic zones of a large lake (2000) Journal of Fish Biology, 56, pp. 51-72;; Hrabik, T.R., Magnuson, J.J., McLain, A.S., Predicting the effects of rainbow smelt on native fishes in small lakes: Evidence from long-term research on two lakes (1998) Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 55, pp. 1364-1371;; Hrabik, T.R., Carey, M.P., Webster, M.S., Interactions between young-of-year exotic rainbow smelt and native yellow perch in a northern temperate lake (2001) Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 130, pp. 568-582;; Irz, P., Laurent, A., Messad, S., Pronier, O., Argillier, C., Influence of site characteristics on fish community patterns in French reservoirs (2002) Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 11, pp. 123-136;; Jackson, D.A., Peres-Neto, P.R., Olden, J.D., What controls who was where in freshwater fish communities: The roles of biotic, abiotic, and spatial factors (2001) Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58, pp. 157-170;; MacRae, P.S.D., Jackson, D.A., The influence of smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu) predation and habitat complexity on the structure of littoral zone assemblages (2001) Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58, pp. 342-351;; Magnuson, J.J., Fish and fisheries ecology (1991) Ecological Applications, 1, pp. 13-26;; Magnuson, J.J., Meisner, J.D., Hill, D.K., Potential changes in the thermal habitat of great lakes fish after global climate warming (1990) Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 119, pp. 254-264;; McPeek, M.A., The consequences of changing the top predator in a food web: A comparative experimental approach (1998) Ecological Monographs, 68, pp. 1-23;; Merritt, R.W., Cummins, K.W., (1996) An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 3rd Edn., , Dubuque, IA, USA. Kendall Hunt Publishing Company;; Olson, M.H., Green, D.M., Rudstam, L.G., Changes in yellow perch (Perca flavescens) growth associated with the establishment of a walleye (Stizostedion vitreum) population in Canadarago Lake, New York (USA) (2001) Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 10, pp. 11-20;; Paszkowski, C.A., Tonn, W.M., Effects of prey size, abundance, and population structure on piscivory by yellow perch (1994) Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 123, pp. 855-865;; Peckarsky, B.L., Frassinet, P.R., Penton, M.A., Conklin Jr., D.J., (1990) Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Northeastern North America, , Ithaca, NY, USA. Comstock Publishing Associates;; Persson, L., Bystrom, P., Wahlstrom, E., Cannibalism and competition in Eurasian perch: Population dynamics of an ontogenetic omnivore (2000) Ecology, 81, pp. 1058-1071;; Pierce, R.B., Tomcko, C.M., Negus, M.T., Interactions between stocked walleyes and native yellow perch in Lake Thirteen, Minnesota: A case history of Percid community dynamics (2006) North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 26, pp. 97-107;; Portnoy, J.W., Winkler, M.G., Sanford, P.R., Farris, C.N., (2001) Kettle Pond Data Atlas for Cape Cod National Seashore: Paleoecology and Modern Water Chemistry, p. 119. , Wellfleet, MA, USA. Cape Cod National Seashore, National Park Service, U.S. Department of Interior;; Post, J.R., Johannes, M.R.S., McQueen, D.J., Evidence of density-dependent cohort splitting in age-0 yellow perch (Perca flavescens): Potential behavioural mechanisms and population-level consequences (1997) Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 54, pp. 867-875;; Quinn, G.P., Keough, M.J., (2002) Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists, , New York. Cambridge University Press;; Quist, M.C., Guy, C.S., Growth and mortality of prairie stream fishes: Relations with fish community and instream habitat characteristics (2001) Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 10, pp. 88-96;; Quist, M.C., Hubert, W.A., Relative effects of biotic and abiotic processes: A test of the biotic-abiotic constraining hypothesis as applied to cutthroat trout (2005) Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 134, pp. 676-686;; Robinson, C.L.K., Tonn, W.M., Influence of environmental factors and piscivory in structuring fish assemblages of small Alberta lakes (1989) Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 46, pp. 81-89;; Roman, C.T., Barrett, N.E., Portnoy, J.W., Aquatic vegetation and trophic condition of Cape Cod national Seashore kettle ponds (2001) Hydrobiologia, 443, pp. 31-42;; Sanderson, B.L., Hrabik, T.R., Magnuson, J.J., Post, D.M., Cyclic dynamics of a yellow perch (Perca flavescens) population in an oligotrophic lake: Evidence for the role of intraspecific interaction (1999) Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 56, pp. 1534-1542;; Sandheinrich, M.B., Hubert, W.A., Intraspecific resource partitioning by yellow perch (Perca flavescens) in a stratified lake (1984) Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 41, pp. 1745-1752;; Thorp, J.H., Covich, A.P., (1991) Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates, , Boston, MA, USA. Academic Press;; Tonn, W.M., Magnuson, J.J., Patterns in the species composition and richness of fish assemblages in northern Wisconsin lakes (1982) Ecology, 63, pp. 1149-1166]]></refworks:cr>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15857">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of male accessory gland extracts on female oviposition and sexual receptivity of the Caribbean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae)]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lentz,Anthony J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Miller,James R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Spencer,Joseph L*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Keller,James E.]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[Anastrepha suspensa (Loew) male accessory glands do not appear to possess a sex peptide, a factor that induces oviposition or inhibits mating receptivity. Injection of accessory gland extracts from laboratory-colony males into virgin females stimulated daily deposition of only 4 eggs per female, comparable to injections of whole reproductive tract extract (5 eggs per female) and negative controls (4 to 5 eggs per female). Mated females laid significantly more (10 eggs per female per d). Studies of wild-caught males and females yielded the same information: injection of an accessory gland/testes extract or saline both elicited 8 eggs per female per d whereas normally mated females laid 16 eggs per female per d. Female receptivity to mating following injection of accessory gland or whole reproductive tract extracts was comparable to the negative control group, in which 67% to 83% of treated females remated and 63% to 89% of control females remated. In contrast, only 43% of once-mated (positive control) females remated when placed with males. Once-mated females also took significantly longer to remate after exposure to males (359 min) than females from both treatment (61 to 169 min) and negative control groups (76 to 122 min). The duration of mating was similar among all groups (24 to 37 min). These results suggest that oviposition and receptivity inhibition in A. suspensa are not mediated by male-derived humoral factors.]]></description>
<dc:publisher><![CDATA[FLORIDA ENTOMOLOGICAL SOC]]></dc:publisher>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Florida Entomologist]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[3]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[92]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[415]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[420]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[9/11/2009 6:25:49 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:16:32 AM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15857</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[SEP]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ sex peptide]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ mating inhibition]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ female mate choice]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ oviposition]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ ANASTREPHA-SUSPENSA DIPTERA]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ REPRODUCTIVE-BEHAVIOR]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ GLOSSINA-MORSITANS]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ SPERM STORAGE]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ DELIA-ANTIQUA]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ LOEW DIPTERA]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ TSETSE-FLY]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ ONION FLY]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ FLIES]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ ANTHOMYIIDAE]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Entomology]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:no><![CDATA[PT: J; NR: 30; TC: 0; J9: FLA ENTOMOL; PG: 6; GA: 489BQ]]></refworks:no>
<refworks:pp><![CDATA[LUTZ; 16125 E LAKE BURRELL DR, LUTZ, FL 33548 USA]]></refworks:pp>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[0015-4040]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:ad><![CDATA[[Lentz, Anthony J.] Bellarmine Univ, Dept Biol, Louisville, KY 40205 USA. [Miller, James R.; Keller, James E.] Michigan State Univ, Dept Entomol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA. [Spencer, Joseph L.] Univ Illinois, Illinois Nat Hist Survey, Champaign, IL 61820 USA.; Lentz, AJ, Bellarmine Univ, Dept Biol, Louisville, KY 40205 USA.]]></refworks:ad>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:sf><![CDATA[Article]]></refworks:sf>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Web of Science]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[9/11/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15857]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>
<refworks:an><![CDATA[000269394900001]]></refworks:an>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15855">
<title><![CDATA[A new Encephalitozoon species (Microsporidia) isolated from the lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois) (Orthoptera: Romaleidae)]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lange,Carlos E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Johny,Shajahan]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Baker,Michael D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Whitman,Douglas W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Solter,Leellen*]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[We describe a new microsporidian species, Encephalitozoon romaleae n. sp., isolated from an invertebrate host, the grasshopper Romalea microplera, collected near Weeks Island, Louisiana, and Jacksonville, Florida. This microsporidian is characterized by specificity to the gastric caecae and midgut tissues of the host and a life cycle that is nearly identical to that of Encephalitozoon hellem and Encephalitozoon cuniculi. Mature spores are larger (3.97 X 1.95 mu m) than those of other Encephalitozoon species. Polar filament coils number 7 to 8 in a single row. Analysis of the small subunit (SSU) rDNA shows that E romaleae fits well into the Encephalitozoon group and is a sister taxon to E hellem. This is the first Encephalitozoon species that has been shown to complete its life cycle in an invertebrate host.]]></description>
<dc:publisher><![CDATA[AMER SOC PARASITOLOGISTS]]></dc:publisher>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Journal of Parasitology]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[4]]></prism:number>
<prism:volume><![CDATA[95]]></prism:volume> 
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[976]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[986]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[9/11/2009 6:07:06 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:16:32 AM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15855</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[August 2009]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ SUBUNIT RIBOSOMAL-RNA]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ ANOCENTOR-NITENS ACARI]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ PHYLOGENETIC-RELATIONSHIPS]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ PHYLUM MICROSPORIDIA]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ FINE-STRUCTURE]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ DNA PHYLOGENY]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ AIDS PATIENTS]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ N-SP]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ CUNICULI]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Parasitology]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:no><![CDATA[PT: J; NR: 52; TC: 0; J9: J PARASITOL; PG: 11; GA: 489WJ]]></refworks:no>
<refworks:pp><![CDATA[LAWRENCE; 810 EAST 10TH STREET, LAWRENCE, KS 66044 USA]]></refworks:pp>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[0022-3395]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:ad><![CDATA[[Lange, Carlos E.; Johny, Shajahan; Baker, Michael D.; Whitman, Douglas W.; Solter, Leellen F.] Natl Univ La Plata, CCT La Plata CONICET, Sci Invest Commiss Buenos Aires Prov, Ctr Parasitol Studies & Vectors CEPAVE, RA-1900 La Plata, Argentina.; Solter, LF, Univ Illinois, Illinois Nat Hist Survey, 1816 S Oak St, Champaign, IL 61820 USA.; lsolter@illinois.edu]]></refworks:ad>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:sf><![CDATA[Article]]></refworks:sf>
<refworks:do><![CDATA[10.1645/GE-1923.1]]></refworks:do>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Web of Science]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[9/11/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15855]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>
<refworks:an><![CDATA[000269455800027]]></refworks:an>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15854">
<title><![CDATA[Cave Pygmarrhopalites Vargovitsh, 2009 (Collembola, Symphypleona, Arrhopalitidae) in United States]]></title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zeppelini,Douglas]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Taylor,Steven J*]]></dc:creator>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Slay,Michael E.]]></dc:creator>
<description><![CDATA[Six new species of Collembola of the family Arrhopalitidae are described from the United States (Pygmarrhopalites leonardwoodensis sp. nov., P. plethorasari sp. nov., P. youngsteadtii sp. nov., P. buffaloensis sp. nov., P. shoshoneiensis sp. nov., and P. ashcraftensis sp. nov.) from caves in Missouri (2 spp.), Arkansas (2 spp.), Nevada, and Indiana, respectively. These new taxa, which display varying degrees of troglomorphy, are compared with previously known species and bring the total described species in North America to 41.]]></description>
<dc:publisher><![CDATA[MAGNOLIA PRESS]]></dc:publisher>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2009]]></dc:date>
<prism:publicationName><![CDATA[Zootaxa]]></prism:publicationName> 
<refworks:rwtype><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></refworks:rwtype>
<prism:number><![CDATA[2204]]></prism:number>
<prism:startingPage><![CDATA[1]]></prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage><![CDATA[18]]></prism:endingPage> 
<refworks:created><![CDATA[9/10/2009 1:49:55 PM GMT ]]></refworks:created>
<refworks:modified><![CDATA[10/27/2009 2:20:00 AM GMT ]]></refworks:modified><link>http://www.refworks.com/refshare?site=023461151737200000/RWWS1AA1279669/CurrentYear&amp;rn=15854</link>
<refworks:FD><![CDATA[20 August 2009]]></refworks:FD>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ cave Collembola]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ taxonomy]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ new species]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ descriptions]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:k1><![CDATA[ Zoology]]></refworks:k1>
<refworks:pp><![CDATA[AUCKLAND; PO BOX 41383, AUCKLAND, ST LUKES 1030, NEW ZEALAND]]></refworks:pp>
<refworks:sn><![CDATA[1175-5326]]></refworks:sn>
<refworks:ad><![CDATA[[Zeppelini, Douglas] Univ Estadual Paraiba, Ctr Ciencias Biol & Sociais Aplicadas, Campus V Lab Sistemat & Conservacao Microartropod, BR-58020540 Joao Pessoa, PB, Brazil. [Zeppelini, Douglas] Assoc Guajiru Ciencia Educ Meio Ambiente, Cabedelo, PB, Brazil. [Taylor, Steven J.] Illinois Nat Hist Survey, Champaign, IL 61820 USA. [Slay, Michael E.] Nature Conservancy, Little Rock, AR 72705 USA.; Zeppelini, D, Univ Estadual Paraiba, Ctr Ciencias Biol & Sociais Aplicadas, Campus V Lab Sistemat & Conservacao Microartropod, Rua Monsenhor Walfredo Leal 487, BR-58020540 Joao Pessoa, PB, Brazil.; zeppelini@daad-alumni.de sjtaylor@illinois.edu mslay@tnc.org]]></refworks:ad>
<refworks:la><![CDATA[English]]></refworks:la>
<refworks:sf><![CDATA[Article]]></refworks:sf>
<refworks:ds><![CDATA[Web of Science]]></refworks:ds>
<refworks:rd><![CDATA[9/10/2009]]></refworks:rd>
<refworks:id><![CDATA[15854]]></refworks:id>
<refworks:u1><![CDATA[FY10]]></refworks:u1>
<refworks:ul><![CDATA[http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2009/f/zt02204p018.pdf]]></refworks:ul>
<refworks:an><![CDATA[000269153600001]]></refworks:an>Anonymous 
<refworks:ol><![CDATA[English(30)]]></refworks:ol>
<refworks:sr><![CDATA[Print(0)]]></refworks:sr></item>

</rdf:RDF>